Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36128379›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2022

Adipogenesis or osteogenesis: destiny decision made by mechanical properties of biomaterials.

Ting Su, Mimi Xu, Feng Lu, Qiang Chang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Bone Organoids: A Novel Tool for Modeling and Managing Skeletal Disorders in Diabetes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Edible Scaffolds for Cultivated Meat Production.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Integrin signaling pathways in mesenchymal stem cells.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Biomimetic Polyurethanes in Tissue Engineering.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Use of Hydrogels in Regenerative Medicine: Focus on Mechanical Properties.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ting SuDepartment of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University 510515 China doctorchq@hotmail.com.
Mimi XuDepartment of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University 510515 China doctorchq@hotmail.com.
Feng LuDepartment of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University 510515 China doctorchq@hotmail.com.
Qiang ChangDepartment of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University 510515 China doctorchq@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0397-2150

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regenerative medicine affords an effective approach for restoring defect-associated diseases, and biomaterials play a pivotal role as cell niches to support the cell behavior and decide the destiny of cell differentiation. Except for chemical inducers, mechanical properties such as stiffness, pore size and topography of biomaterials play a crucial role in the regulation of cell behaviors and functions. Stiffness may determine the adipogenesis or osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)

Identifiers

PMID36128379
PMCPMC9425444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.