ArticleJournal of clinical imaging science2022
Invisalign treatment with mandibular advancement: A retrospective cohort cephalometric appraisal.
Article in Journal of clinical imaging science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of clear aligners treatment in growing patients: a systematic review.Frontiers in oral health · 2024Pooled it
- The effect of mandibular advancement with clear aligners compared with activator therapy on maxillary and mandibular volumes: a randomized controlled trial using CBCT.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Analysis of the efficacy of AngelAligner A6 mandibular advancer and Twin Block in the treatment of class II malocclusion in growing patients: a prospective clinical study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Management of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion in a Growing Patient Using Clear Aligners and Class II Elastics: A Case Report.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of the skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue effects of twin block, monoblock, and invisalign mandibular advancement appliances.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Efficacy of clear functional orthodontic appliances versus traditional functional appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Korean journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
- Clear aligners for Class II correction in growing patients: elastics vs mandibular advancement.The Angle orthodontist · 2026Article
- Scientific overview of mandibular advancement devices: a bibliometric and altmetric analysis.Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2026Review
- Do treatment outcomes of clear aligners remain stable over time? A systematic review.Journal of orthodontic science · 2026Review
- A comparative 3D finite element analysis of mandibular advancement with clear aligners and twin block appliances.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Retrospective Evaluation of InvisalignDentistry journal · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the efficacy of clear aligners in mandibular advancement and their effect on mandibular trabecular structures using fractal dimension analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Orthodontic Management of Class II Malocclusion with Clear Aligners: Mandibular Advancement vs. Class II Elastics.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Soft tissue evaluation of functional therapy in growing patients with class II malocclusion: mandibular advancement vs. twin block-a retrospective study.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Article
- Effects of clear aligners and traditional removable appliances on oral microbiome in mixed dentition: a comparative study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Review
- Clear Aligners in the Growing Patient: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Biomechanical effects of different mandibular movements and torque compensations during mandibular advancement with clear aligners: a finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Does mandibular advancement with clear aligners have the same skeletal and dentoalveolar effects as traditional functional appliances?BMC oral health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine the skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue cephalometric effects of class II correction using Invisalign's mandibular advancement feature in growing patients. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort clinical study was performed on cases that were started between 2017 and 2019. A total of 32 patients (13 females, 19 males), with an average age of 13 years old (9.9-14.8 years) had undergone Invisalign treatment (Align Technology, Inc., San Jose, CA) wherein the mandibular advancement phase was completed were included. Photos, digital study models, and cephalograms were taken once during the patients' initial visit and again upon completing the mandibular advancement phase of treatment. The number of aligners worn and the time of treatment in months was recorded for each subject. Cephalometric analysis was performed and overjet and overbite were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software (version 25; SPSS, Chicago, Ill) and the level of significance was set at Results: All 32 patients had multiple jumps staged for the precision wings, i.e., incremental advancement. The average length of treatment for the MA phase was 9.2 months (7.5-13.8 months) and the average number of aligners used during this time was 37 (30-55). Statistically significant differences between T1 and T2, in favor of class II correction, were observed in the ANB angle, WITS appraisal, facial convexity, and mandibular length. The nasolabial angle, overjet, and overbite also showed statistically significant changes between T1 and T2. Conclusion: Invisalign aligners with the mandibular advancement feature took approximately 9 months for 1.5 mm of overjet correction. The lower incisor angulation was maintained during class II correction. The minimal skeletal changes are in favor of class II correction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.