Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36128342›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2022

Assessing the use of a clinical decision support tool for pain management in primary care.

Nate C Apathy, Lindsey Sanner, Meredith C B Adams, Burke W Mamlin, Randall W Grout, Saura Fortin, Jennifer Hillstrom, Amit Saha, Evgenia Teal, Joshua R Vest and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nate C ApathyLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-8544
Lindsey SannerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Meredith C B AdamsAnesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3969-4279
Burke W MamlinClem McDonald Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Randall W GroutClem McDonald Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Saura FortinPrimary Care, Eskenazi Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Jennifer HillstromIS Ambulatory & Research Solutions, Eskenazi Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Amit SahaAnesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Evgenia TealData Core, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Joshua R VestDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7226-9688
Nir MenachemiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Robert W HurleyAnesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Christopher A HarleClem McDonald Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4803-3632
Olena MazurenkoDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1003-9262

Funding

Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
Nudging Primary Care Providers toward Guideline-Recommended Opioid Prescribing through Easier and More Convenient EHR Information DesignR33DA046085 · NIDA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI HARLE, CHRISTOPHER ALBERT, MAZURENKO, OLENA · 2019 to 2021
$1.7M
Identifying opioid response phenotypes in low back pain electronic health dataK08EB022631 · NIBIB · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ADAMS, MEREDITH C. B. · 2017 to 2020
$737k
Nudging Primary Care Providers toward Guideline-Recommended Opioid Prescribing through Easier and More Convenient EHR Information DesignR21DA046085 · NIDA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI HARLE, CHRISTOPHER ALBERT · 2017 to 2018
$402k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001420NIAMS NIH HHS L30 AR074165NIBIB NIH HHS K08 EB022631NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA046085NIDA NIH HHS R33 DA046085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Given time constraints, poorly organized information, and complex patients, primary care providers (PCPs) can benefit from clinical decision support (CDS) tools that aggregate and synthesize problem-specific patient information. First, this article describes the design and functionality of a CDS tool for chronic noncancer pain in primary care. Second, we report on the retrospective analysis of real-world usage of the tool in the context of a pragmatic trial. Materials and methods: The tool known as OneSheet was developed using user-centered principles and built in the Epic electronic health record (EHR) of 2 health systems. For each relevant patient, OneSheet presents pertinent information in a single EHR view to assist PCPs in completing guideline-recommended opioid risk mitigation tasks, review previous and current patient treatments, view patient-reported pain, physical function, and pain-related goals. Results: Overall, 69 PCPs accessed OneSheet 2411 times (since November 2020). PCP use of OneSheet varied significantly by provider and was highly skewed (site 1: median accesses per provider: 17 [interquartile range (IQR) 9-32]; site 2: median: 8 [IQR 5-16]). Seven "power users" accounted for 70% of the overall access instances across both sites. OneSheet has been accessed an average of 20 times weekly between the 2 sites. Discussion: Modest OneSheet use was observed relative to the number of eligible patients seen with chronic pain. Conclusions: Organizations implementing CDS tools are likely to see considerable provider-level variation in usage, suggesting that CDS tools may vary in their utility across PCPs, even for the same condition, because of differences in provider and care team workflows.

Indexed as

chronic painclinical decision support toolprimary care

Identifiers

PMID36128342
PMCPMC9476612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.