Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36128339›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2022

"There's no money in community dissemination": A mixed methods analysis of researcher dissemination-as-usual.

Heatherlun S Uphold, Amy Drahota, Tatiana E Bustos, Mary Katherine Crawford, Zachary Buchalski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Communicating Health Research With Plain Language.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heatherlun S UpholdDivision of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.
Amy DrahotaDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1169-3546
Tatiana E BustosDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Mary Katherine CrawfordDivision of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8231-5628
Zachary BuchalskiDivision of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.

Funding

The Flint Center for Health Equity SolutionsU54MD011227 · NIMHD · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON-LAWRENCE, VICKI · 2016 to 2020
$10.7M
NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD011227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The field of dissemination and implementation science has the potential to narrow the translational research-to-practice gap and improve the use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) within community-based settings. Yet, foundational research related to dissemination efforts, such as understanding researcher attitudes, practices, and the determinants to sharing research findings, is lacking within extant literature. Methods: A sequential explanatory (QUANqual) mixed methods design was used to examine 85 academic researchers' perspectives and self-reported dissemination methods used to share research outcomes with community stakeholders to better understand researcher's usual dissemination practices (referred to as Results: Multiple linear regression examined predictors of the quantity of dissemination strategies utilized by researchers, finding that years since earning their degree, time spent disseminating, and the number of reasons for engaging in dissemination efforts predicted greater numbers of dissemination strategies utilized by researchers. Individual, semi-structured interviews with a subset of researchers ( Conclusion: The necessary first step in research translation is the dissemination of research evidence, and understanding dissemination-as-usual can identify areas of need to advance translational science.

Indexed as

dissemination and implementation scienceInformation disseminationinformation sharingresearch-to-practice gaptranslation

Identifiers

PMID36128339
PMCPMC9453578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.