Comparison of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter (ONSD) in Low-Pressure Versus Normal Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Study.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Ultrasound Measurement of Dynamic Changes in Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter During Liposuction Surgery: A Prospective Clinical Trial.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026
   Trial
2. Dynamic effects of low- and high-pressure pneumoperitoneum on optic nerve sheath diameter during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded clinical trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026
   Trial
3. Comparison of low-pressure and standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cardiopulmonary comorbidities: a double blinded randomized clinical trial.BMC surgery · 2024
   Trial

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as