Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36128174›Full record

ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022

Clinical Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and CT in Preoperative TN Staging of Esophagogastric Junction Cancer.

Tao Peng, Zhan Lou, Xiaoyuan Wang, Di Huang, Guiyun Zhang, Huibin Gao, Shuguang Li

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readControlled Clinical TrialRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tao PengThe First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6391-3227
Zhan LouThe First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China.
Xiaoyuan WangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China.
Di HuangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3212-7327
Guiyun ZhangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China.
Huibin GaoThe First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China.
Shuguang LiThe First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0458-3448
Hebei North University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the incidence of esophagogastric junction cancer has increased year by year. It is a special type of gastric cancer, with 80% of patients being clinically in the middle and late stages. The traditional treatment methods are extremely ineffective, and the accuracy of preoperative staging is not good enough. At present, the medical treatment for esophagogastric junction cancer mainly adopts surgery and postoperative adjuvant therapy. The current mainstream clinical diagnostic methods of esophagogastric junction cancer before concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy are X-ray, CT examination, and gastroscopic diagnosis. However, these clinical diagnostic methods have many limitations. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) can accurately locate malignant tumors in the digestive tract, surrounding microstructures. It can diagnose lymphatic metastasis so as to provide a clear imaging basis for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. This method can also effectively improve the prognosis of the esophagus and stomach according to the characteristics of the patient. In this experiment, we conducted a controlled trial on patients with stage III esophagogastric junction cancer, divided into an experimental group (neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery) and a control group (conventional surgery). The preoperative EUS staging in the control group, the preoperative EUS staging in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group, and the postoperative pathological staging were compared. The experiment showed that in the control group, the preoperative and postoperative accuracy of EUS was 89.2%, while the preoperative and postoperative accuracy of CT examination was only 62.5%. In the experimental group, the preoperative and postoperative accuracies of EUS and CT were 79.6% and 56.7%, respectively. EUS has both specificity and accuracy due to CT examination. Through studying EUS technology in the staging and diagnosis of esophagogastric junction cancer, the therapeutic effect of esophagogastric junction cancer can be improved. The prognosis of esophagogastric junction cancer can also be improved.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaEsophageal NeoplasmsEndosonographyEsophagogastric JunctionHumansNeoplasm StagingTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID36128174
PMCPMC9473909
OpenAlexW4295115615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.