Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36128166›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2022

Effect of drug use in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: A scoping review.

Nisha Dabhi, Panagiotis Mastorakos, Jennifer D Sokolowski, Ryan T Kellogg, Min S Park

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nisha DabhiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States.
Panagiotis MastorakosDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States.
Jennifer D SokolowskiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States.
Ryan T KelloggDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States.
Min S ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Drugs of abuse have been associated with ischemic stroke; however, the clinical presentation, outcomes, and treatment data in this population are limited. The overall safety and efficacy of thrombolytic therapy and thrombectomy in these patients remain unclear. This scoping review summarizes published complications and clinical outcomes in patients with recent abuse of cocaine, methamphetamine (MA), cannabis, decongestant, opioids, alcohol, and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) presenting with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of the primary literature that assessed outcomes data of thrombolytic therapy or thrombectomy in drug users with acute ischemic stroke. We searched PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science. Demographic and stroke characteristics, treatment, complications, and clinical outcomes at last follow-up were collected and summarized. Results: We identified 51 studies in this review. Drugs of abuse of interest were cocaine (14 studies), MDMA (one study), MA (eight studies), cannabis (23 studies), alcohol (two studies), decongestants (one study), and opioids (two studies). Clinical presentation and stroke presentation were most commonly described features. Thrombectomy outcomes were reported for four patients total (two studies), all with history of cocaine use. Thrombolysis treatment and outcomes were reported for 8851 patients (five studies) with history of cocaine, alcohol, or cannabis. Both treatments were pursued in three patients (three studies). Treatment complications included intracerebral hemorrhage, vasospasm, and cerebral edema. Conclusion: Evidence for thrombolytic and thrombectomy treatment in drug users remains limited. Controlled studies are needed to examine complication profile and outcomes following thrombolytic and thrombectomy treatment in this population.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular accidentDrugs of abuseIschemic strokeThrombectomyThrombolysis

Identifiers

PMID36128166
PMCPMC9479649
OpenAlexW4292336343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.