Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36128120›Full record

ReviewSurgical neurology international2022

Robotics in neurosurgery: Current prevalence and future directions.

Rohin Singh, Kendra Wang, Muhammad Bilal Qureshi, India C Rangel, Nolan J Brown, Shane Shahrestani, Oren N Gottfried, Naresh P Patel, Mohamad Bydon

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical neurology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rohin SinghAlix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale.
Kendra WangDepartment of Osteopathic Medicine, A. T. Still University, Mesa.
Muhammad Bilal QureshiAlix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale.
India C RangelAlix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale.
Nolan J BrownAlix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale.
Shane ShahrestaniAlix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale.
Oren N GottfriedDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham.
Naresh P PatelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix.
Mohamad BydonMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Rochester, United States.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USA.T. Still University · USDuke Medical Center · USWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The first instance of a robotic-assisted surgery occurred in neurosurgery; however, it is now more common in other fields such as urology and gynecology. This study aims to characterize the prevalence of robotic surgery among current neurosurgery programs as well as identify trends in clinical trials pertaining to robotic neurosurgery. Methods: Each institution's website was analyzed for the mention of a robotic neurosurgery program and procedures. The future potential of robotics in neurosurgery was assessed by searching for current clinical trials pertaining to neurosurgical robotic surgery. Results: Of the top 100 programs, 30 offer robotic cranial and 40 offer robotic spinal surgery. No significant differences were observed with robotic surgical offerings between geographic regions in the US. Larger programs (faculty size 16 or over) had 20 of the 30 robotic cranial programs (66.6%), whereas 21 of the 40 robotic spinal programs (52.5%) were at larger programs. An initial search of clinical trials revealed 223 studies, of which only 13 pertained to robotic neurosurgery. Spinal fixation was the most common intervention (six studies), followed by Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS, two studies), Cochlear implants (two studies), laser ablation (LITT, one study), and endovascular embolization (one study). Most studies had industry sponsors (9/13 studies), while only five studies had hospital sponsors. Conclusion: Robotic neurosurgery is still in its infancy with less than half of the top programs offering robotic procedures. Future directions for robotics in neurosurgery appear to be focused on increased automation of stereotactic procedures such as DBS and LITT and robot-assisted spinal surgery.

Indexed as

Robotic assistedRobotic cranialRobotic neurosurgeryRobotic spinal

Identifiers

PMID36128120
PMCPMC9479589
OpenAlexW4292336603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.