ArticleNMC case report journal2022
First Bite Syndrome after Carotid Endarterectomy for High Carotid Bifurcation and Extensive Lesions: Two Case Reports and Literature Review.
Article in NMC case report journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Scar neuroma infiltration to treat post-surgical first bite syndrome.Interventional pain medicine · 2026Article
- Anatomical features and clinical significance of the ascending pharyngeal artery in carotid endarterectomy.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
First bite syndrome (FBS) is an extremely rare complication of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). FBS presents with unique characteristics, development of brief and intense pain in the ipsilateral parotid region at the first bite of each meal, and improvement with subsequent mastication. Here, we report two cases of FBS following CEA. Both cases had anatomical difficulty of a high carotid bifurcation and a high cervical lesion. The lingual and facial arteries (or their common arterial trunk) branched off the external carotid artery (ECA) close to a high carotid bifurcation. The operations required exposure of the ECA distal to these two branches and the distal internal carotid artery (ICA) with a wider range of dissection for clamping the vessels. Several days or weeks after CEA, the patients developed FBS, and their meal-related pain completely resolved in the ensuing weeks. Especially in patients with a high carotid bifurcation, several branches of the ECA tend to originate from the proximal portion of the ECA, similar to octopus arms. During CEA, in these patients, dissection around the ECA and its branches in a wider range is required for exposure of each vessel and placement of the cross-clamp. These procedures can lead to injury to the external carotid nerve and plexus, possibly causing FBS. Additionally, because of the close location of the superior cervical ganglion, external carotid nerves, and distal ICA, manipulation for exposure of the distal end of a high plaque can increase the risk of injury to the cervical sympathetic nerves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.