Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36127956›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Sarcoidosis and Its Dermatological Manifestations: A Narrative Review.

Jancy Koneti, Swathi Priya Cherukuri, Sai Gadde, Revanth Kalluru, Rahul Chikatimalla, Thejaswi Dasaradhan

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Suspected anal malignancy turned out to be sarcoidosis; a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Contemporary management of sarcoidosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jancy KonetiResearch, Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Narketpally, IND.
Swathi Priya CherukuriResearch, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, IND.
Sai GaddeResearch, Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Narketpally, IND.
Revanth KalluruResearch, Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Narketpally, IND.
Rahul ChikatimallaResearch, Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Narketpally, IND.
Thejaswi DasaradhanResearch, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, IND.
Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sarcoidosis is an enigma diagnosed by ruling out other etiologies of granulomatous inflammation. The multisystem manifestations of sarcoidosis and the clinical polymorphism pose a diagnostic challenge to all physicians. The skin is the most commonly affected organ after the lungs in sarcoidosis. Dermatological manifestations can appear before, during, or after systemic involvement, and the type of skin lesion can have prognostic significance. Also, a biopsy of skin lesions is less invasive and more accessible to perform than a biopsy of visceral organs. Thus, in certain ways, cutaneous manifestations can aid in the diagnosis and prognosis of systemic disease. This article has focused on the frequently encountered skin lesions of sarcoidosis along with their prevalence, clinical features, and management.

Indexed as

cutaneous sarcoidosiserythema nodosumlupus perniosarcoidosissubcutaneous nodules

Identifiers

PMID36127956
PMCPMC9481194
OpenAlexW4291954876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.