Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36127932›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Saudi Heart Association2022

Evaluation of ECG Repolarization Parameters in a Worker Cohort Working the Night Shift.

Sezen B Uzunget, Kader E Sahin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Saudi Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sezen B UzungetSincan Dr. Nafiz Körez State Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Kader E SahinDepartment of Cardiology, Adõyaman University Education and Research Hospital, Adõyaman, Turkey.
Adama Science and Technology University · ETSivas State Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Night Shift work is an increasingly common working order that affects human well-being and it is little known about its arrhythmic role in the cardiovascular system. We aimed to investigate the effect of working at night shifts on P-wave dispersion (Pd), QT and QTc dispersions (QTd, QTcd resp) on surface electrocardiography. Methods: We included 286 foundry workers who work at night shift and 100 foundry workers who work on day time only. The night shift workers were divided into three subgroups according to the length of time they worked at night shift. Surface electrocardiography and blood tests were applied for all participants. Results: Pd, QTd and QTcd values increased in the night shift workers compared to the day time workers (p < 0.05). In subgroup analysis; the night shift workers for more than 15 years had a significantly higher Pd, QTd and QTcd compared to others (p < 0.001). Correlation analysis revealed significant positive correlations with working duration and Pd (r = 0.578, p < 0.001) and QTcd (r = 0.417, p < 0.001). In the linear regression analysis, working duration at night shift was significantly associated with Pd and QTcd values, independent from other associated clinical risk parameters. Conclusions: This study makes one of the first attempts to assess changes in ECG parameters reflecting tendency to rhythm disturbances, in night shift workers. Our results further underline the importance of covering a comprehensive evaluation of ECG in periodical health check-ups in night shift workers to evaluate the risk of both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias.

Indexed as

Night workP-wave dispersionQTc dispersionShift workShift worker

Identifiers

PMID36127932
PMCPMC9458321
OpenAlexW4292544803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.