Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36127919›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT

Latin Questionnaire: a threshold strategy for anamnestic screening of occupational musculoskeletal disorders through specific reference groups.

Daniela Colombini, Olga Menoni, Natale Battevi, Enrico Occhipinti, Mirko Villanueva Pezoa, Aquiles Hernandez, Ruddy Cesar Facci, Edoardo Santino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. First results of the application of the Latin Questionnaire in comparison with populations of reference workers obtained through preliminary epidemiological studies.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniela ColombiniScientific Association, Ergonomics of Posture and Movement International Ergonomics School, Ergonomics, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6318-268X
Olga MenoniScientific Association, Ergonomics of Posture and Movement International Ergonomics School, Ergonomics, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7811-8813
Natale BatteviScientific Association, Ergonomics of Posture and Movement International Ergonomics School, Ergonomics, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3258-865X
Enrico OcchipintiScientific Association, Ergonomics of Posture and Movement International Ergonomics School, Ergonomics, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1969-0510
Mirko Villanueva PezoaScientific Association, Ergonomics of Posture and Movement International Ergonomics School, Ergonomics, Milan, Italy.
Aquiles HernandezScientific Association, Ergonomics of Posture and Movement International Ergonomics School, Ergonomics, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7877-5485
Ruddy Cesar FacciScientific Association, Ergonomics of Posture and Movement International Ergonomics School, Ergonomics, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2554-0930
Edoardo SantinoScientific Association, Ergonomics of Posture and Movement International Ergonomics School, Ergonomics, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0115-8099

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Health surveillance programs conducted for both individual workers and working populations as a whole are managed by occupational health physicians and focus on disorders and diseases caused by biomechanical overload, primarily for preventive purposes. Objectives: The purpose of the paper is to update an anamnestic protocol for studying musculoskeletal disorders after more than 40 years experience of its application. The updated version has been re-named the Latin Questionnaire. The protocol enables preliminary epidemiological evaluation, by comparing results of exposed populations to those from a reference population, thanks to the introduction of a severity threshold, a concept lacking in similar questionnaires. Methods: The Latin Questionnaire is based on symptoms of discomfort, pain, and paraesthesia. Each symptom is described in terms of location, duration, number of episodes, irradiation, and treatment. The model covers present symptoms during the previous 12 months and is designed to identify positive anamnestic cases (when positive according to the threshold), cases with minor disorders, and negative cases for conditions involving the spine and upper and lower limbs. Results: The updated anamnestic model was validated again through the collaborative effort involving 37 physicians from 14 Latin countries. To enable comparisons with exposed populations, an updated reference population (4,000 unexposed workers) is presented, evaluating the percentages of subjects positive according to thresholds for spine and upper and lower limbs and the incidence of acute lower back pain, broken down by gender and age groups. Examples of application of the questionnaire are also presented. Conclusions: The Latin Questionnaire, which has also been implemented in digital form (free download), allows selection of significant anamnestic cases compared to cases with minor disorders. This strategy is indispensable for correctly conducting preliminary epidemiological studies. Example applications confirm the presence of significant differences between the percentages of subjects with positive thresholds in exposed compared to reference groups, with surpluses proportional to their levels of biomechanical overload.

Indexed as

epidemiologyhealth surveillancemusculoskeletal diseasesreference parameters.survey and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36127919
PMCPMC9458334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.