Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36127864›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of case reports2022

Splenic Hamartoma: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Khaled A Obeidat, Mohammed W Afaneh, Hamzeh Mohammad Al-Domaidat, Hamzeh Ibrahim Al-Qazakzeh, Fatima J AlQaisi

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Splenic hamartoma mimicking angiosarcoma: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Splenic hamartomas in children.World journal of clinical cases · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khaled A ObeidatDepartment of Surgery, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Mohammed W AfanehDepartment of Surgery, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Hamzeh Mohammad Al-DomaidatDepartment of Surgery, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Hamzeh Ibrahim Al-QazakzehDepartment of Surgery, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Fatima J AlQaisiDepartment of Pathology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Jordan University of Science and Technology · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Splenic hamartoma (SH) is a benign vascular lesion, usually found incidentally on abdominal images or at autopsy. Only around 200 cases have been reported since 1861, when SH was first described by Rokitansky. Although it is very rare, it is important to be familiar with it, as it may be a diagnostic challenge to distinguish SH from other mass lesions of the spleen based solely on preoperative investigations. CASE REPORT We describe a case of symptomatic, isolated, single splenic hamartoma in a 19-year-old, otherwise healthy young man who presented with upper abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting for a few months. The examination was unremarkable. The patient has been previously evaluated with abdominal ultrasonography, which found a suspicious splenic hyperechoic lesion. Computed tomography revealed a heterogeneous 5×7 cm enhancing lesion in the spleen, concerning for splenic hamartoma. The patient underwent laparoscopic splenectomy and recovered well. The histopathology examination confirmed the diagnosis of splenic hamartoma. CONCLUSIONS Splenic hamartoma is a rare benign vascular lesion of debated etiology. Most cases are asymptomatic and are found incidentally on images, in splenectomies performed for other reasons, or at autopsy. Radiologic findings may suggest the diagnosis and new modalities have shown accuracy in distinguishing splenic hamartomas. However, resection with formal or partial splenectomy is usually still needed since the differential diagnosis is wide, from benign to aggressive lesions, and histopathology remains the criterion standard for diagnosis. Given its benign nature, we found no cases of recurrence or metastasis in the literature.

Indexed as

HamartomaSplenic DiseasesVascular DiseasesAdultHumansMaleSplenectomyUltrasonographyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID36127864
PMCPMC9513818
OpenAlexW4293048682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.