Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36127720›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical science2022

Pathophysiology of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome.

Shih-Pin Chen, Shuu-Jiun Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Idiopathic extracranial internal carotid artery vasospasm: case report and systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Blood Pressure Management in Neurologic Emergencies.Emergency medicine clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shih-Pin Chen *Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan. chensp1977@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3492-9902
Shuu-Jiun Wang *Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan. sjwang@vghtpe.gov.tw.

Funding

Ministry of Education The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in TaiwanMinistry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 108-2314-B-010-023-MY3Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 108-2321-B-010-001-Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 110-2321-B-010-005-Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 111-2321-B-A49-004-Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 108-2321-B-010-014-MY2Ministry of Science and Technology (TW) 108-2314-B-010-022-MY3Ministry of Science and Technology (TW) 110-2326-B-A49A-501-MY3Ministry of Science and Technology (TW) MOST-107-2314-B-010-021Taipei Veterans General Hospital V109D52-001-MY3-3Taipei Veterans General Hospital V111C-158Taipei Veterans General Hospital VGH-106-D9-001-MY2-2Taipei Veterans General Hospital VGHUST110-G1-3-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a complex neurovascular disorder being recognized during the past two decades. It is characterized by multiple abrupt severe headaches and widespread cerebral vasoconstrictions, with potential complications such as ischemic stroke, convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. The clinical features, imaging findings, and dynamic disease course have been delineated. However, the pathophysiology of RCVS remains elusive. Recent studies have had substantial progress in elucidating its pathogenesis. It is now believed that dysfunction of cerebral vascular tone and impairment of blood-brain barrier may play key roles in the pathophysiology of RCVS, which explains some of the clinical and radiological manifestations of RCVS. Some other potentially important elements include genetic predisposition, sympathetic overactivity, endothelial dysfunction, and oxidative stress, although the detailed molecular mechanisms are yet to be identified. In this review, we will summarize what have been revealed in the literature and elaborate how these factors could contribute to the pathophysiology of RCVS.

Indexed as

Posterior Leukoencephalopathy SyndromeVasospasm, IntracranialBrainCerebral HemorrhageHumansVasoconstrictionBlood–brain barrierNeurovascular unitReversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromeThunderclap headache

Identifiers

PMID36127720
PMCPMC9489486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.