Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36127718›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2022

Evidence-based selection of orthodontic miniscrews, increasing their success rate in the mandibular buccal shelf. A randomized, prospective clinical trial.

Michał Sarul, Joanna Lis, Hyo-Sang Park, Kornelia Rumin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05280678 (Evidence-based Selection of Orthodontic Miniscrews, Increasing Their Success Rate in the Mandibular Buccal Shelf), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05280678 nacompletednot on this map

Evidence-based Selection of Orthodontic Miniscrews, Increasing Their Success Rate in the Mandibular Buccal Shelf: A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWroclaw Medical UniversityRan2016 to 2019Enrolled100ConditionsClass III MalocclusionArmsOrthodontic miniscrew insertion in the mandibular buccal shelf
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Global scholarly output on orthodontic temporary anchorage devices (TADs): A silver jublee scientometric analysis.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michał SarulDepartment of Dentofacial Orthopedics and Orthodontics, Wroclaw Medical University, ul. Krakowska 26, 50-425, Wroclaw, Poland.
Joanna LisDepartment of Dentofacial Orthopedics and Orthodontics, Wroclaw Medical University, ul. Krakowska 26, 50-425, Wroclaw, Poland.
Hyo-Sang ParkDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 41940, Korea.
Kornelia RuminDepartment of Dentofacial Orthopedics and Orthodontics, Wroclaw Medical University, ul. Krakowska 26, 50-425, Wroclaw, Poland. kornelia.rumin@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkeletal anchorage has made it possible to perform complex orthodontic tooth movements that are difficult or even impossible to achieve with conventional orthodontic treatment. Mandibular buccal shelf miniscrews, used for distalization, play a particularly important role in treatment of Class III malocclusion. Unfortunately, stability of the miniscrews placed in the mandible is still considered at higher risk of failure compared to other intraoral locations. The aim of our study was to determine the influence of the miniscrew size on their long-term stability, occurrence of oral mucosa inflammation and pain lasting over 48 h after implantation.

methods184 Absoanchor

results91.3% of the SH2018-10 and 75% of the SH1514-08 miniscrews were stable, and this difference was statistically significant (p < .05). Inflammation of the oral mucosa was noticed around both types of miniscrews and affected 50% of the SH2018-10 and 26.09% of the SH1514-08 group (p < .05). Pain lasting longer than 48 h after implantation was related to 60.87% and 20.65% of the SH2018-10 and the SH1514-08 miniscrews (p < .05), respectively. Inflammation associated with larger SH2018-10 miniscrews did not affect their stability (p > .05), contrary to the SH1514-08 ones (p < .05). When inflammation was present, the overall success rate declined to 64.29%, from 94.74% noted for TADs without inflammation. According to the log-rank test, smaller TADs failed significantly sooner than the larger ones (p = .002).

conclusionLarger SH2018-10 miniscrews are the anchorage of choice for the mandibular buccal shelf, despite triggering inflammation and long-lasting pain significantly more often than the smaller ones. Therefore, this issue should be discussed with every patient prior to miniscrew use. Trial registration ID: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05280678 Date of Registration: 15/03/2022. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Malocclusion, Angle Class IIIOrthodontic Anchorage ProceduresBone ScrewsHumansInflammationMandibleOrthodontic Appliance DesignPainProspective StudiesMandibleOrthodontic anchorage proceduresOrthodontics

Identifiers

PMID36127718
PMCPMC9487090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.