Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36127696›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2022

Framing rehabilitation through health policy and systems research: priorities for strengthening rehabilitation.

Alarcos Cieza, Aku Kwamie, Qhayiya Magaqa, Nino Paichadze, Carla Sabariego, Karl Blanchet, Nukhba Zia, Abdulgafoor M Bachani, Abdul Ghaffar, Bente Mikkelsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alarcos CiezaSensory Functions, Disability and Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland. ciezaa@who.int.
Aku KwamieAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland.
Qhayiya MagaqaSensory Functions, Disability and Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland.
Nino PaichadzeCenter on Commercial Determinants of Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire Avenue, NW, Washington DC, 20052, United States of America.
Carla SabariegoDepartment of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Frohburgstrasse 3, P.O. Box 4466, 6002, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Karl BlanchetGeneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, Université de Genève, The Graduate Institute (IHEID), 28, Boulevard du Pont-d'Arve, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nukhba ZiaInternational Health, Health Systems Division, International Injury Research Unit, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States of America.
Abdulgafoor M BachaniInternational Health, Health Systems Division, International Injury Research Unit, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States of America.
Abdul GhaffarAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland.
Bente MikkelsenDepartment of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent estimates report that 2.4 billion people with health conditions globally could benefit from rehabilitation. While the benefits of rehabilitation for individuals and society have been described in the literature, many individuals, especially in low- and middle-income countries do not have access to quality rehabilitation. As the need for rehabilitation continues to increase, it is crucial that health systems are adequately prepared to meet this need. Practice- and policy-relevant evidence plays an important role in health systems strengthening efforts. The aim of this paper is to report on the outcome of a global consultative process to advance the development of a research framework to stimulate health policy and systems research (HPSR) for rehabilitation, in order to generate evidence needed by key stakeholders.

methodsA multi-stakeholder participatory technical consultation was convened by WHO to develop a research framework. This meeting included participants from selected Member States, rehabilitation experts, HPSR experts, public health researchers, civil society and other stakeholders from around the world. The meeting focused on introducing systems approaches to stakeholders and deliberating on priority rehabilitation issues in health systems. Participants were allocated to one of four multi-stakeholder groups with a facilitator to guide the structured technical consultations. Qualitative data in the form of written responses to guiding questions were collected during the structured technical consultations. A technical working group was then established to analyse the data and extract its emerging themes. This informed the development of the HPSR framework for rehabilitation and a selection of preliminary research questions that exemplify how the framework might be used.

resultsA total of 123 individuals participated in the multi-stakeholder technical consultations. The elaborated framework is informed by an ecological model and puts forth elements of the six WHO traditional building blocks of the health system, while emphasizing additional components pertinent to rehabilitation, such as political priority, engagement and participatory approaches, and considerations regarding demand and access. Importantly, the framework highlights the multilevel interactions needed across health systems in order to strengthen rehabilitation. Additionally, an initial set of research questions was proposed as a primer for how the framework might be used.

conclusionsStrengthening health systems to meet the increasing need for rehabilitation will require undertaking more HPSR to inform the integration of rehabilitation into health systems globally. We anticipate that the proposed framework and the emerging research questions will support countries in their quest to increase access to rehabilitation for their populations.

Indexed as

Government ProgramsHealth PolicyHumansPublic HealthHealth policyHealth systems strengtheningRehabilitationSystems thinking

Identifiers

PMID36127696
PMCPMC9487068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.