Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36127636›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2022

Genomic evidence refutes the hypothesis that the Bornean banteng is a distinct species.

Xin Sun, Marta Maria Ciucani, Jacob Agerbo Rasmussen, M Thomas P Gilbert, Mikkel-Holger S Sinding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xin SunUniversity Museum, NTNU, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5902-9949
Marta Maria CiucaniCenter for Evolutionary Hologenomics, Globe Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1353, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8998-4899
Jacob Agerbo RasmussenCenter for Evolutionary Hologenomics, Globe Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1353, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7710-8912
M Thomas P GilbertUniversity Museum, NTNU, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5805-7195
Mikkel-Holger S SindingSection for Computational and RNA Biology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 1350, Copenhagen, Denmark. mhssinding@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1371-219X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The banteng (Bos javanicus) is an endangered species within the wild Asian Bos complex, that has traditionally been subdivided into three geographically isolated subspecies based on (i) mainland Southeast Asia (B. j. birmanicus), (ii) Java (B. j. javanicus), and (iii) Borneo (B. j. lowi). However, analysis of a single Bornean banteng mitochondrial genome generated through a genome skimming approach was used to suggest that it may actually represent a distinct species (Ishige et al. in Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal 27(4):2453-4. http://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2015.1033694 , 2016). To explore this hypothesis further, we leveraged on the GenBank (NCBI) raw read sequencing data originally used to construct the mitochondrial genome and reconstructed its nuclear genome at low (0.2×) coverage. When analysed in the context of nuclear genomic data representing a broad reference panel of Asian Bos species, we find the Bornean banteng affiliates strongly with the Javan banteng, in contradiction to the expectation if the separate species hypothesis was correct. Thus, despite the Bornean banteng's unusual mitochondrial lineage, we argue there is no genomic evidence that the Bornean banteng is a distinct species.

Indexed as

Genome, MitochondrialGenomicsAnimalsAsia, SoutheasternBorneoCattleBornean bantengGenomicsPhylogenyTaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID36127636
PMCPMC9487127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.