Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36127571›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2022

Secondary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: Updates in Treatment and Prophylaxis Strategies.

Victor Orellana-Noia, Aseala Abousaud

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Distinguishing clinical and imaging characteristics of primary central nervous system lymphoma from high-grade glioma and metastatic brain tumors.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victor Orellana-NoiaLymphoma Program, Winship Cancer Institute/Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. Orellana-Noia@Emory.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0742-1436
Aseala AbousaudLymphoma Program, Winship Cancer Institute/Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Emory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementReferring to any central nervous system (CNS) involvement with preceding or concurrent systemic disease, secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL) lacks a clear standard of care and historically carries a very poor prognosis. Aggressive histologies predominate, most notably diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with higher relative frequency in Burkitt lymphoma but lower absolute incidence. Therapeutic strategies commonly feature intensive CNS-penetrant chemotherapy, including methotrexate, cytarabine, and others. Combination regimens, novel targeted agents, and cellular therapy considerations are reviewed, noting that patients with SCNSL are often excluded from clinical trials and dedicated SCNSL studies are historically limited. Given these challenges, there has been renewed attention on CNS prophylaxis as well as strategies for early CNS detection. Prophylaxis is standard of care in Burkitt lymphoma, whereas its role in DLBCL and related histologies is increasingly unclear.

Indexed as

Burkitt LymphomaCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseNeoplasms, Second PrimaryAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCentral Nervous SystemCytarabineHumansMethotrexateRituximabCytarabineMethotrexateRituximabCentral nervous systemLymphomaMethotrexateProphylaxisSecondary CNS lymphoma

Identifiers

PMID36127571
OpenAlexW4296480824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.