Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36127511›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2022

Years of life lost during the Covid-19 pandemic in Sweden considering variation in life expectancy by level of geriatric care.

Marcus Ebeling, Enrique Acosta, Hal Caswell, Anna C Meyer, Karin Modig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Excess Mortality Estimation.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. How should we speak about years of life lost (YLL) values?European journal of epidemiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marcus EbelingUnit of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Visit: Nobelsväg 13, Box 210, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. marcus.ebeling@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6531-8525
Enrique AcostaLaboratory of Population Health, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6250-4018
Hal CaswellInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4394-6894
Anna C MeyerUnit of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Visit: Nobelsväg 13, Box 210, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2749-7179
Karin ModigUnit of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Visit: Nobelsväg 13, Box 210, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5151-4867

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 788195Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (FORTE) 2020-00028Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (FORTE) 2021-00451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has not affected the population evenly. This must be acknowledged when it comes to understanding the Covid-19 death toll and answering the question of how many life years have been lost. We use level of geriatric care to account for variation in remaining life expectancy among individuals that died during 2020. Based on a linkage of administrative registers, we estimate remaining life expectancy stratified by age, sex, and care status using an incidence-based multistate model and analyze the number of years of life lost (YLL) during 2020 in Sweden. Our results show that remaining life expectancy between individuals with and without care differs substantially. More than half of all Covid-19 deaths had a remaining life expectancy lower than 4 years. Yet, in a 1-year perspective, Covid-19 did not seem to replace other causes of death. Not considering the differences in remaining life expectancy in the affected populations overestimated YLL by 40% for women and 30% for men, or around 2 years per death. While the unadjusted YLL from Covid-19 amounted to an average of 7.5 years for women and 8.6 years for men, the corresponding YLL adjusted for care status were 5.4 and 6.6, respectively. The total number of YLL to Covid-19 in 2020 is comparable to YLL from ischemic heart disease in 2019 and 2020. Our results urge the use of subgroup specific mortality when counting the burden of Covid-19. YLL are considerably reduced when the varying susceptibility for death is considered, but even if most lifespans were cut in the last years of life, the YLL are still substantial.

Indexed as

COVID-19AgedFemaleHumansLife ExpectancyLongevityMalePandemicsSwedenCare homeCovid-19Excess deathsLife expectancyMultistate modelYears of life lost

Identifiers

PMID36127511
PMCPMC9488891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.