ArticleComparative medicine2022
Physiologic Effects of Housing Rats in Metabolic Cages.
Article in Comparative medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of housing and high-fructose diet on behavior and cardiovascular response to eucalyptus wildfire smoke in WKY rats.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A · 2026Article
- Metabolism in hematology: Technological advances open new perspectives on disease biology and treatment.HemaSphere · 2025Review
- Article
- Evaluation of the cognitive, physiological, and biomarker effects of heavy metal exposure in Wistar rats.Veterinary world · 2024Article
- The effect of enriched versus depleted housing on eucalyptus smoke-induced cardiovascular dysfunction in mice.Inhalation toxicology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, metabolic cages (MC) are the only way to achieve serial sampling of urine and feces in rodents. However, the use of this caging creates a dramatic change from an animal's usual microenvironment. Here we sought to examine the effect of MC on physiologic parameters that are stress-responsive in rats. We surgically implanted 8 male Wistar rats (weight, 150 to 175 g) with telemetric transmitters and allowed them to recover for at least 2 wk. At the beginning of the study, the rats were moved to conventional open-top cages, and telemetry recording was initiated. After 24 h, the rats were moved to MC or to another conventional cage and the recording continued for another 24 h. Finally, the rats were returned to their home cages, and telemetry recording was performed for a final 24 h. After 10 days, this process was then repeated, with MC and conventional assignments switched. During the 78-h monitoring period, we recorded heart rate, arterial blood pressure, locomotor activity, body weight, and food and water consumption. Heart rate and arterial blood pressure showed transient but significant changes. Locomotor activity during the dark phase was greatly decreased in MC compared with conventional cages, perhaps due to space constraints. In addition, when the rats were housed in MC, they showed a small but significant weight loss. Food consumption did not differ between housing environments, but water consumption was lower when rats were in MC. In conclusion, the housing of rats in MC for 24 h can elicit mild and reversible cardiovascular changes. This finding is consistent with European Directive 2010/63/EU, which considers short-term (less than 24 h) restraint in MC a procedure of mild severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.