Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36127123›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Perceptions of generic medicines and medication adherence after percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective multicentre cohort study.

Trond Røed Pettersen, Jan Schjøtt, Heather G Allore, Bjørn Bendz, Britt Borregaard, Bengt Fridlund, Alf Inge Larsen, Jan Erik Nordrehaug, Svein Rotevatn, Tore Wentzel-Larsen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Trond Røed PettersenDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3757-4847
Jan SchjøttDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Bergen, Norway.
Heather G AlloreDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Bjørn BendzDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Britt BorregaardDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Odense Universitetshospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2702-0231
Bengt FridlundDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Alf Inge LarsenDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Bergen, Norway.
Jan Erik NordrehaugDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Bergen, Norway.
Svein RotevatnDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Tore Wentzel-LarsenCentre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Tone Merete NorekvålDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway tone.merete.norekval@helse-bergen.no.ORCID 0000-0003-3640-2119
Haukeland University Hospital · NOLinnaeus University · SEOslo University Hospital · NOStavanger University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine patient perceptions of generic medicines 2 and 6 months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and to determine whether these perceptions moderate medication adherence.

designProspective multicentre cohort study with repeated measures of perceptions of generic medicines and medication adherence.

settingThe CONCARD

participantsA total of 3417 adults (78% men), using both generic and brand name medicines, with a mean age of 66 years (SD 11) who underwent PCI were followed up 2 and 6 months after discharge from hospital.

main outcome measuresPerceptions of generic medicines were the main outcome. The secondary outcome was medication adherence.

resultsPerceptions of generic medicines were significantly more negative at 2 than at 6 months (1.10, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.79, p=0.002). Female sex (-4.21, 95% CI -6.75 to -1.71, p=0.001), older age (-0.12, 95% CI -0.23 to -0.02, p=0.020), lower education level (overall p<0.001), ethnicity (overall p=0.002), Norwegian nationality (10.27, 95% CI 8.19 to 12.40, p<0.001) and reduced self-reported health status (0.19, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.41, p=0.003) were significantly associated with negative perceptions of generic medicines. There was no evidence to suggest that perceptions of generic medicines moderate the association between sociodemographic and clinical variables and medication adherence (p≥0.077 for all covariates). Moreover, self-reported medication adherence was high, with 99% scoring at or above the Medication Adherence Report Scale midpoint at both time points. There were no substantial correlations between negative perceptions of generic medicines and medication non-adherence at 2 months (

conclusionsMistrust and uncertainty about the safety and efficacy of generic medicines remains in a sizeable proportion of patients after PCI. This applies especially to those of lower socioeconomic status, older age, female sex, immigrants and those with poorer mental health. However, this study demonstrated a shift towards more positive perceptions of generic medicines in the longer term.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionAdultAgedCohort StudiesDrugs, GenericFemaleHumansMaleMedication AdherenceProspective StudiesDrugs, GenericCoronary heart diseaseCoronary interventionHealth policy

Identifiers

PMID36127123
PMCPMC9490600
OpenAlexW4296794145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.