Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36127116›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Challenges in detecting and managing mild cognitive impairment in primary care: a focus group study in Shanghai, China.

Yuan Lu, Chaojie Liu, Yvonne Wells, Dehua Yu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparing Short Cognitive Screening Instruments in an Outreach Memory Clinic in Primary Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Knowledge, Awareness, and Attitude of Healthcare Stakeholders on Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia in Qatar.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuan LuDepartment of General Practice, Tongji University Affiliated Yangpu Hospital, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4360-8476
Chaojie LiuSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia c.liu@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0877-0424
Yvonne WellsSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Dehua YuDepartment of General Practice, Tongji University Affiliated Yangpu Hospital, Shanghai, China.
La Trobe University · AUShanghai Medical Information Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDetection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is essential in slowing progression to dementia. Primary care plays a vital role in detecting and managing MCI. The chronic care model (CCM) provides effective methods to manage chronic diseases.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore how MCI services are delivered in primary care in China.

methodsFocus group interviews were conducted face to face among MCI stakeholders from six community health centres (CHCs) involved in the 'friendly community programme' in Shanghai, China. A total of 124 MCI stakeholders were interviewed, consisting of 6 groups (n=42) of general practitioners (GPs), 3 groups (n=18) of CHC managers, 4 groups (n=32) of people with MCI and 4 groups (n=32) of informal caregivers. Content and thematic analyses were performed using a combination of induction and deduction approaches.

resultsThree major themes emerged from the data corresponding to the CCM framework: hesitant patients, unprepared providers and misaligned environments. While the public are hesitant to seek medical attention for MCI problems, due to misunderstanding, social stigma and a lack of perceived benefits, GPs and CHCs are not well prepared either, due to lack of knowledge and a shortage of GPs, and a lack of policy, funding and information support. None of these issues can be addressed separately without tackling the others.

conclusionThis study combined the diverse perceptions of all the main stakeholders to detect and manage MCI in primary care settings in China. A vicious circle was found among the three interconnected CCM domains, creating a gridlock that should be addressed through a system's approach targeting all of the above-mentioned aspects.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionCaregiversChinaFocus GroupsHumansPrimary Health Caredelirium & cognitive disordersprimary carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID36127116
PMCPMC9490618
OpenAlexW4296520239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.