Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36127102›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Conditions for the success and the feasibility of health mediation for healthcare use by underserved populations: a scoping review.

Elodie Richard, Stephanie Vandentorren, Linda Cambon

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elodie RichardPHAReS, Bordeaux Population Health, Centre Inserm U1219, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France elodie.richard.2@u-bordeaux.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-1908-3507
Stephanie Vandentorren *PHAReS, Bordeaux Population Health, Centre Inserm U1219, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Linda Cambon *PHAReS, Bordeaux Population Health, Centre Inserm U1219, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6040-9826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis article aims to analyse the conditions under which health mediation for healthcare use is successful and feasible for underserved populations.

methodWe conducted a scoping review on the conditions for effective health mediation according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews standards. We searched for articles in the following databases: PubMed, PsychINFO, Scopus and Cairn published between 1 January 2015 and 18 December 2020. We selected the articles concerning health mediation interventions or similar, implemented in high-income countries and conducted among underserved populations, along with articles that questioned their effectiveness conditions. We created a two-dimensional analysis grid of the data collected: a descriptive dimension of the intervention and an analytical dimension of the conditions for the success and feasability of health mediation.

results22 articles were selected and analysed. The scoping review underlines many health mediation characteristics that articulate education and healthcare system navigation actions, along with mobilisation, engagement, and collaboration of local actors among themselves and with the populations. The conditions for the success and the feasability were grouped in a conceptual framework of health mediation.

conclusionThe scoping review allows us to establish an initial framework for analysing the conditions for the success and the feasability of health mediation and to question the consistency of the health mediation approach regarding cross-cutting tensions and occasionally divergent logic.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareVulnerable PopulationsFeasibility StudiesHumansIncomePopulation GroupsPUBLIC HEALTHQuality in health careSTATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS

Identifiers

PMID36127102
PMCPMC9490640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.