Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36127080›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Nursing contributions to virtual models of care in primary care: a scoping review protocol.

Crystal Vaughan, Julia Lukewich, Maria Mathews, Lindsay Hedden, Marie-Eve Poitras, Shabnam Asghari, Michelle Swab, Dana Ryan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Crystal VaughanFaculty of Nursing, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5443-3483
Julia LukewichFaculty of Nursing, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada jlukewich@mun.ca.
Maria MathewsDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Lindsay HeddenFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Marie-Eve PoitrasDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Shabnam AsghariCenter for Rural Health Studies, Discipline of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Michelle SwabHealth Sciences Library, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Dana RyanFaculty of Nursing, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSince the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual care has gained increased attention, particularly in primary care for the ongoing delivery of routine services. Nurses have had an increased presence in virtual care and have contributed meaningfully to the delivery of team-based care in primary care; however, their exact contributions in virtual models of primary care remain unclear. The Nursing Role Effectiveness Model, applied in a virtual care and primary care context, outlines the association between structural variables, nursing roles and patient outcomes. The aim of this scoping review is to identify and synthesise the international literature surrounding nurse contributions to virtual models of primary care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology will guide this review. We performed preliminary searches in April 2022 and will use CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase and APA PsycInfo for the collection of sources for this review. We will also consider grey literature, such as dissertations/theses and organisational reports, for inclusion. Studies will include nurses across all designations (ie, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, practical nurses). To ensure studies capture roles, nurses should be actively involved in healthcare delivery. Sources require a virtual care and primary care context; studies involving the use of digital technology without patient-provider interaction will be excluded. Following a pilot test, trained reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts for inclusion and extract relevant data. Data will be organised using the Nursing Role Effectiveness Model, outlining the virtual care and primary care context (structure component) and the nursing role concept (process component). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review will involve the collection and analysis of secondary sources that have been published and/or are publicly available. Therefore, ethics approval is not required. Scoping review findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences, targeting international primary care stakeholders.

Indexed as

COVID-19Research DesignDelivery of Health CareHumansPandemicsPrimary Health CareScoping Reviews as TopicInformation technologyOrganisation of health servicesPRIMARY CARE

Identifiers

PMID36127080
PMCPMC9490598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.