Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36126551›Full record

ArticlePreventive veterinary medicine2022

Frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infection in dogs and cats: Results of a retrospective serological survey in Šumadija District, Serbia.

Slavoljub Stanojevic, Sonja Radojicic, Dusan Misic, Damjan Srejić, Dragan V Vasiljevic, Kristina Prokic, Nevenka Ilić

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive veterinary medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Slavoljub StanojevicDirectorate of National Reference Laboratories, Batajnicki Drum 10, 11080 Zemun, Serbia. Electronic address: slavoljub.stanojevic@minpolj.gov.rs.
Sonja RadojicicUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Infectious Animal Diseases and Diseases of Bees, Bulevar Oslobođenja 18, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia. Electronic address: sonjar@vet.bg.ac.rs.
Dusan MisicWroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Department of Functional Foods Development, Chelmonskiego Street, 37,51-630 Wroclaw, Poland. Electronic address: dusan.misic@upwr.edu.pl.
Damjan SrejićKragujVet Veterinary Clinic, Luja Pastera 2, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia. Electronic address: damjansrejic1976@gmail.com.
Dragan V VasiljevicUniversity of Kragujevac, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Svetozara Markovica 69, Kragujevac, Serbia; Public Health Institute Kragujevac, Center for Hygiene and Human Ecology, Nikole Pasica 1, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia. Electronic address: dvg_gana@yahoo.com.
Kristina ProkicPublic Health Institute Kragujevac, Center for Hygiene and Human Ecology, Nikole Pasica 1, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia. Electronic address: tina85kg@gmail.com.
Nevenka IlićPublic Health Institute Kragujevac, Center for Hygiene and Human Ecology, Nikole Pasica 1, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia. Electronic address: nena.ilic@izjzkg.rs.
University of Kragujevac · RSNational Library of Serbia · RSUniversity of Belgrade · RSWrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has long been known that coronaviruses cause various infectious diseases in animals. Although SARS-CoV-2 is genetically related to viruses isolated from Rhinolophus bats, the exact origin, mode of transmission, and how the human species has become the epidemiological reservoir of the virus have not yet been established with certainty. Although the main route of transmission is human-to-human, there are considerable numbers of reported cases of infection in animal species, predominantly among pet animals. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in dogs and cats during the COVID-19 pandemic in Šumadija District, Serbia. We used serology to identify household contacts of pet animals with infected pet owners and the degree of association. The study presented in this paper is also the first study of this type in Serbia. The results of a retrospective serosurvey, which was conducted in dogs and cats with different exposure risk factors, were analyzed to find the possible modes of transmission between humans and animals. The relative frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infection in dogs was 1.45% bounded with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.0007-7.73%, while in cats, it was 5.56% (95% CI: 0.77-4.13%). The relative frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pet owners was 11% (95% CI: 6.25-18.63%). In pets that were in close contact with COVID-19 positive owners, the seropositivity was found to be 9%. Out of a total of five stray dogs and cats tested, seropositivity was observed in two animals. Detected SARS-CoV-2 infection in pets shows that these animals are susceptible to infection and that the most common means of virus transmission to pets is through contact with diseased owners. However, the presence of infection in stray dogs and cats is not clear and needs further research.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesChiropteraCOVID-19Dog DiseasesAnimalsCatsDogsHumansPandemicsPetsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2SerbiaCompanion animalELISASARS-CoV-2Stray dogs and cats

Identifiers

PMID36126551
PMCPMC9467926
OpenAlexW4295539306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.