Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36126071›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Molecular characterization and biofilm-formation analysis of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., and Escherichia coli isolated from Brazilian swine slaughterhouses.

Rebecca Lavarini Dos Santos, Emilia Fernanda Agostinho Davanzo, Joana Marchesini Palma, Virgílio Hipólito de Lemos Castro, Hayanna Maria Boaventura da Costa, Bruno Stéfano Lima Dallago, Simone Perecmanis, Ângela Patrícia Santana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca Lavarini Dos SantosFaculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8051-501X
Emilia Fernanda Agostinho DavanzoFaculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Joana Marchesini PalmaFaculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4958-2569
Virgílio Hipólito de Lemos CastroFaculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Hayanna Maria Boaventura da CostaFaculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Bruno Stéfano Lima DallagoFaculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Simone PerecmanisFaculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Ângela Patrícia SantanaFaculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4969-9831
Universidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to verify the presence of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., and Escherichia coli in two Brazilian swine slaughterhouses, as well as to perform antibiograms, detect virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes, and evaluate the in vitro biofilm-forming capability of bacterial isolates from these environments. One Salmonella Typhi isolate and 21 E. coli isolates were detected, while L. monocytogenes was not detected. S. Typhi was isolated from the carcass cooling chamber's floor, resistant to several antimicrobials, including nalidixic acid, cefazolin, chloramphenicol, doxycycline, streptomycin, gentamicin, tetracycline, and sulfonamide, and contained resistance genes, such as tet(B), tet(C), tet(M), and ampC. It also showed moderate biofilm-forming capacity at 37°C after incubating for 72 h. The prevalence of the 21 E. coli isolates was also the highest on the carcass cooling chamber floor (three of the four samplings [75%]). The E. coli isolates were resistant to 12 of the 13 tested antimicrobials, and none showed sensitivity to chloramphenicol, an antimicrobial prohibited in animal feed since 2003 in Brazil. The resistance genes MCR-1, MCR-3, sul1, ampC, clmA, cat1, tet(A), tet(B), and blaSHV, as well as the virulence genes stx-1, hlyA, eae, tir α, tir β, tir γ, and saa were detected in the E. coli isolates. Moreover, 5 (23.8%) and 15 (71.4%) E. coli isolates presented strong and moderate biofilm-forming capacity, respectively. In general, the biofilm-forming capacity increased after incubating for 72 h at 10°C. The biofilm-forming capacity was the lowest after incubating for 24 h at 37°C. Due to the presence of resistance and virulence genes, multi-antimicrobial resistance, and biofilm-forming capacity, the results of this study suggest a risk to the public health as these pathogens are associated with foodborne diseases, which emphasizes the hazard of resistance gene propagation in the environment.

Indexed as

Escherichia coli InfectionsListeria monocytogenesAbattoirsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsBrazilCefazolinChloramphenicolDoxycyclineDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGentamicinsNalidixic AcidSalmonellaAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefazolinChloramphenicolDoxycyclineEscherichia coli ProteinsGentamicinsMCR-1 protein, E coliNalidixic AcidStreptomycinSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID36126071
PMCPMC9488830
OpenAlexW4296801640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.