Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36126035›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2022

CBP/p300 activation promotes axon growth, sprouting, and synaptic plasticity in chronic experimental spinal cord injury with severe disability.

Franziska Müller, Francesco De Virgiliis, Guiping Kong, Luming Zhou, Elisabeth Serger, Jessica Chadwick, Alexandros Sanchez-Vassopoulos, Akash Kumar Singh, Muthusamy Eswaramoorthy, Tapas K Kundu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Reflecting on 2022.PLoS biology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Franziska MüllerDepartment of Brain Sciences, Division of Neuroscience, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Francesco De VirgiliisDepartment of Brain Sciences, Division of Neuroscience, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7170-1013
Guiping KongDepartment of Brain Sciences, Division of Neuroscience, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Luming ZhouDepartment of Brain Sciences, Division of Neuroscience, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7284-1744
Elisabeth SergerDepartment of Brain Sciences, Division of Neuroscience, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jessica ChadwickDepartment of Brain Sciences, Division of Neuroscience, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7287-7707
Alexandros Sanchez-VassopoulosDepartment of Brain Sciences, Division of Neuroscience, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9990-6309
Akash Kumar SinghTranscription and Disease Laboratory, Molecular Biology and Genetics Unit, JNCASR, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7460-2886
Muthusamy EswaramoorthyChemistry and Physics of Materials Unit, JNCASR, Bengaluru, India.
Tapas K KunduTranscription and Disease Laboratory, Molecular Biology and Genetics Unit, JNCASR, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7790-214X
Simone Di GiovanniDepartment of Brain Sciences, Division of Neuroscience, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3154-5399
Imperial College London · GBJawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interruption of spinal circuitry following spinal cord injury (SCI) disrupts neural activity and is followed by a failure to mount an effective regenerative response resulting in permanent neurological disability. Functional recovery requires the enhancement of axonal and synaptic plasticity of spared as well as injured fibres, which need to sprout and/or regenerate to form new connections. Here, we have investigated whether the epigenetic stimulation of the regenerative gene expression program can overcome the current inability to promote neurological recovery in chronic SCI with severe disability. We delivered the CBP/p300 activator CSP-TTK21 or vehicle CSP weekly between week 12 and 22 following a transection model of SCI in mice housed in an enriched environment. Data analysis showed that CSP-TTK21 enhanced classical regenerative signalling in dorsal root ganglia sensory but not cortical motor neurons, stimulated motor and sensory axon growth, sprouting, and synaptic plasticity, but failed to promote neurological sensorimotor recovery. This work provides direct evidence that clinically suitable pharmacological CBP/p300 activation can promote the expression of regeneration-associated genes and axonal growth in a chronic SCI with severe neurological disability.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationSpinal Cord InjuriesAnimalsAxonsMiceNeuronal PlasticityRecovery of Function

Identifiers

PMID36126035
PMCPMC9488786
OpenAlexW4296489152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.