Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36126025›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

The Canadian Mother-Child Cohort Active Surveillance Initiative (CAMCCO): Comparisons between Quebec, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta.

Anick Bérard, Padma Kaul, Sherif Eltonsy, Brandace Winquist, Dan Chateau, Steven Hawken, Ann Sprague, Mark Walker, Sasha Bernatsky, Michal Abrahamowicz and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Adverse outcomes among pregnant women with COVID-19 according to hospitalization status: A prospective individual participant data meta-analysis in Europe and North America.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 3 countries.

Anick BérardResearch Center, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7535-5517
Padma KaulFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Sherif EltonsyCollege of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Brandace WinquistCommunity Health and Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Dan ChateauCollege of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Steven HawkenClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ann SpragueBetter Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Mark WalkerClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sasha BernatskyDivisions of Rheumatology and Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre, Canada.
Michal AbrahamowiczDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Global & Population Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Cristiano Soares de MouraFaculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Évelyne VinetDivisions of Rheumatology and Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre, Canada.
Bruce CarletonDivision of Translational Therapeutics Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Gillian HanleyDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Tim OberlanderUniversity of British Columbia, School of Population and Public Health, Department of Pediatrics, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Odile SheehyFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Yessica Haydee GomezFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jessica GorguiResearch Center, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Anamaria SavuCanadian VIGOUR Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAMcGill University · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAAustralian National University · AUCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CAOntario Stroke Network · CAUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven that pregnant women taking medications are excluded from clinical trials, real-world evidence is essential. We aimed to build a Canadian Mother-Child Cohort Active Surveillance Initiative (CAMCCO) and compare frequency of prematurity, low-birth-weight (LBW), major malformations, multiplicity, and gestational medication use across four provinces.

methodsCAMCCO is a collaborative research infrastructure that uses real-world data from large provincial health care databases in Canada; developed with standardized methods to similarly construct population-based pregnancy/child cohorts with longitudinal follow-up by linking administrative/hospital/birth databases. CAMCCO also includes a common repository to i) share algorithms and case definitions based on diagnostic and procedural codes for research/training purpose, and ii) download aggregate data relevant to primary care providers, researchers, and decision makers. For this study, data from Quebec (1998-2015), Manitoba (1995-2019), Saskatchewan (1996-2020), and Alberta (2005-2018) are compared (Chi-square tests, p-values), and trends are calculated using Cochran-Armitage trend tests.

resultsAlmost two-thirds (61%) of women took medications during pregnancy, mostly antibiotics (26%), asthma drugs (8%), and antidepressants (4%). Differences in the prevalence of prematurity (5.9-6.8%), LBW (4.0-5.2%), and multiplicity (1.0-2.5%) were statistically significant between provinces (p<0.001). Frequency of major malformations increased over time in Quebec (7-11%; p<0.001), Saskatchewan (5-11%; p<0.001), and Alberta (from 7-8%; p<0.001), and decreased in Manitoba (5-3%; p<0.001). Cardiovascular and musculoskeletal malformations were the most prevalent.

interpretationMedications are often used among Canadian pregnancies but adverse pregnancy outcomes vary across provinces. Digitized health data may help researchers and care providers understand the risk-benefit ratios related to gestational medication use, as well as province-specific trends.

Indexed as

Mother-Child RelationsWatchful WaitingAlbertaFemaleHumansManitobaPregnancyQuebecSaskatchewan

Identifiers

PMID36126025
PMCPMC9488808
OpenAlexW4296807073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.