ArticleJAMA network open2022
Optimal Pharmacologic Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Meta-analysis.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative effectiveness of pharmacotherapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of chronic diuretic use in older adults: an umbrella review of recently published systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized-controlled trials.European geriatric medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical practice guidelines for diagnostic and treatment of the chronic heart failure.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2024Guideline
- Effect of Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Global heart · 2023Pooled it
- Evaluating the efficacy of dual-task training in older patients with chronic heart failure and comorbid cognitive frailty: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial.BMC geriatrics · 2026Trial
- Contemporary medical therapy for heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- TNFR2 Agonism as a Sex-Specific Therapy for Novel Osteoarthritis-Induced Cardiac Dysfunction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Large-Scale Proteomic Profiling of Incident Heart Failure and Its Subtypes in Older Adults.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative clinical outcomes and safety of finerenone, SGLT2 inhibitors, RAS inhibitors and ARNI in heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Advances in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors to Prevent Liver Fibrosis in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Scientific Speculation or an Opportunity to Improve Real Clinical Practice?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- From Plants to Protection: Cardiorenal Benefits in Non-Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease and Heart Failure.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- One Syndrome, Many Faces: A Unified Perspective on Heart Failure Phenotypes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Beta blockers linked to reduced 1-Year mortality in critically ill congestive heart failure patients with differential benefits across subgroups.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Establishing a National Quality of Care Framework for Heart Failure in Korea: Keep Standards for Heart Failure (KSHF) Initiative.International journal of heart failure · 2025Review
- Risk factors of mortality among heart failure patients in Jordan: the Jordanian Heart Failure Registry (JoHFR).Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- AdipoRon ameliorates the progression of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction via mitigating lipid accumulation and fibrosis.Journal of advanced research · 2025Article
- Optimal Medical Therapy for Heart Failure and Integrated Care in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report From the ESC-EHRA EORP Atrial Fibrillation Long-Term General Registry.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Observational
- Navigating the Landscape of Coronary Microvascular Research: Trends, Triumphs, and Challenges Ahead.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: In recent years, significant progress has been made in the pharmacologic treatment of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but there is still insufficient evidence for drug therapy for HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Objective: To compare the outcomes associated with different drug combinations for the treatment of HFpEF and HFmrEF. Data Sources: A search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases was conducted for studies published from inception to October 9, 2021. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials on the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), β-blockers, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data extraction and bias assessment were independently performed by 2 reviewers following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline. All data for 3 outcomes were pooled with a fixed-effect model. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were first hospitalization for HF, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were evaluated using a bayesian network meta-analysis model. Results: In this analysis, 19 randomized clinical trials, including 20 633 patients with HF and an ejection fraction of 40% or more, without a remarkable risk of bias were included. Compared with placebo, no treatments were associated with a significant reduction in the risk of all-cause death or cardiovascular death. SGLT2 inhibitors, ARNIs, and MRAs were associated with a significant decrease in the risk of HF hospitalization compared with placebo (SGLT2 inhibitors: HR, 0.71 [95% CrI, 0.60-0.83]; ARNIs: HR, 0.76 [95% CrI, 0.61-0.95]; MRAs: HR, 0.83 [95% CrI, 0.69-0.99]), and SGLT2 inhibitors were the optimal drug class in terms of reducing the risk for HF admission. Sensitivity analysis results demonstrated a progressive decrease in the risk of HF admission and an advance in mean rank associated with the increasing use of drug classes. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors were the optimal drug class for HFpEF and HFmrEF, consistent with the most recent guideline recommendation. The incremental use of combinations of SGLT2 inhibitors, ACE inhibitors or ARBs, and β-blockers may be associated with accumulative benefits in HF hospitalization rather than all-cause death among patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.