ArticleJAMA network open2022
Evaluation of Textbook Outcome as a Composite Quality Measure of Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond individual complications: textbook outcome in elective minimally invasive cholecystectomy and the role of robotic approach.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive surgery in locally advanced colon cancer contributes to textbook outcome achievement and the long-term outcome.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Impairment in activities of daily living and textbook outcome after major emergency abdominal surgery.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Defining "optimal recovery" in colorectal surgery: a path to precision prehabilitation.Annals of coloproctology · 2026Article
- Surgery-centered integrated strategies for personalized hepatocellular carcinoma care.Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Review
- Textbook outcomes for lower extremity bypass: A useful quality metric for care optimization.Journal of vascular surgery · 2026Article
- Defining and predicting textbook outcomes in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Textbook outcome and associated risk factors in laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Is there a difference in textbook outcomes of emergency cholecystectomy in older patients compared with younger patients?World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Article
- Textbook outcomes as a novel patient-centric metric to inform carotid revascularization.Journal of vascular surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison of textbook outcomes between laparoscopic and open liver resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Textbook outcomes in the laparoscopic common bile duct exploration of choledocholithiasis: a new comprehensive quality evaluation criterion.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Worse cholecystectomy outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: were staff shortages or a change in patient case-mix the culprit?Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Deep learning-based surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2024Article
- A patient-centered textbook outcome measure effectively discriminates contemporary elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair quality.Journal of vascular surgery · 2024Article
- Predictors of textbook outcome following oesophagogastric cancer surgery.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2024Article
- Textbook outcome in urgent early cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: results post hoc of the S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C study.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2024Observational
- Integration of the social determinants of health into quality indicators for colorectal cancer surgery: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: A textbook outcome (TO) is a composite quality measure that incorporates multiple perioperative events to reflect the most desirable outcome. The use of TO increases the event rate, captures more outcomes to reflect patient experience, and can be used as a benchmark for quality improvement. Objectives: To introduce the concept of TO to elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), propose the TO criteria, and identify characteristics associated with TO failure. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was performed at 3 surgical units in a single health board in the United Kingdom. Participants included all patients undergoing elective LC between January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2020. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: The TO criteria were defined based on review of existing TO metrics in the literature for other surgical procedures. A TO was defined as an unremarkable elective LC without conversion to open cholecystectomy, subtotal cholecystectomy, intraoperative complication, postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥2), postoperative imaging, postoperative intervention, prolonged length of stay (>2 days), readmission within 100 days, or mortality. The rate of TOs was reported. Reasons for TO failure were reported, and preoperative characteristics were compared between TO and TO failure groups using both univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regressions. Results: A total of 2166 patients underwent elective LC (median age, 54 [range, 13-92] years; 1579 [72.9%] female). One thousand eight hundred fifty-one patients (85.5%) achieved a TO with an unremarkable perioperative course. Reasons for TO failure (315 patients [14.5%]) included conversion to open procedure (25 [7.9%]), subtotal cholecystectomy (59 [18.7%]), intraoperative complications (40 [12.7%]), postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥2; 92 [29.2%]), postoperative imaging (182 [57.8%]), postoperative intervention (57 [18.1%]), prolonged length of stay (>2 days; 142 [45.1%]), readmission (130 [41.3%]), and mortality (1 [0.3%]). Variables associated with TO failure included increasing American Society of Anesthesiologists score (odds ratio [OR], 2.55 [95 CI, 1.69-3.85]; P < .001), increasing number of prior biliary-related admissions (OR, 2.68 [95% CI, 1.36-5.27]; P = .004), acute cholecystitis (OR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.08-1.85]; P = .01), preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (OR, 2.07 [95% CI, 1.46-2.92]; P < .001), and preoperative cholecystostomy (OR, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.54-6.76]; P = .002). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that applying the concept of TO to elective LC provides a benchmark to identify suboptimal patterns of care and enables institutions to identify strategies for quality improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.