Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36125757›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Proteomic Sample Preparation and Data Analysis in Line with the Archaeal Proteome Project.

Stefan Schulze, Mechthild Pohlschroder

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefan SchulzeDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. sschulze@sas.upenn.edu.
Mechthild PohlschroderDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. pohlschr@sas.upenn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the ecological, evolutionary and economical significance of archaea, key aspects of their cell biology, metabolic pathways, and adaptations to a wide spectrum of environmental conditions, remain to be elucidated. Proteomics allows for the system-wide analysis of proteins, their changes in abundance between different conditions, as well as their post-translational modifications, providing detailed insights into the function of proteins and archaeal cell biology. In this chapter, we describe a sample preparation and mass spectrometric analysis workflow that has been designed for Haloferax volcanii but can be applied to a broad range of archaeal species. Furthermore, proteomics experiments provide a wealth of data that is invaluable to various disciplines. Therefore, we previously initiated the Archaeal Proteome Project (ArcPP), a community project that combines the analysis of multiple datasets with expert knowledge in various fields of archaeal research. The corresponding bioinformatic analysis, allowing for the integration of new proteomics data into the ArcPP, as well as the interactive exploration of ArcPP results is also presented here. In combination, these protocols facilitate an optimized, detailed and collaborative approach to archaeal proteomics.

Indexed as

Haloferax volcaniiProteomeData AnalysisMass SpectrometryProteomicsProteomeArchaeaBioinformaticsFractionationMass spectrometryPost-translational modificationsProtein database searchProteomics

Identifiers

PMID36125757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.