ArticleCardiovascular toxicology2022
Protective Effect of Ginsenosides Rg1 on Ischemic Injury of Cardiomyocytes After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Article in Cardiovascular toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of Plant-Derived Antioxidants in Oxidative Stress-Associated Myocardial Infarction: Structure-Activity Relationship (SAR)-Based Mechanistic Insights.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Rg1-Loaded Tetrahedral DNA Nanostructures Attenuate Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury by Suppressing Oxidative and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Article
- Roles and mechanisms of ginsenoside Rg1 in coronary artery disease: Progress and perspectives.Journal of ginseng research · 2025Review
- Ginsenoside Rg1 treats chronic heart failure by downregulating ERK1/2 protein phosphorylation.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2024Article
- Navigating the Landscape of Coronary Microvascular Research: Trends, Triumphs, and Challenges Ahead.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Ginsenoside Rg1 exerts anti-arrhythmic effect by inhibiting IScience progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) leads to anoxia and ischemia of cardiomyocytes, followed by apoptosis. This study investigated the protective effect of ginsenoside Rg1 (Rg1) on myocardial ischemia injury in rats with AMI. Rats were randomly divided into five groups: group A (blank control group), group B (hypoxia/reoxygenation group), group C (hypoxia/reoxygenation + 10 mg/L Rg1), group D (hypoxia/reoxygenation + 20 mg/L Rg1) and group E (hypoxia/reoxygenation + 40 mg/L Rg1). The survival rate, apoptosis rate, expression of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4), fibroblast growth factor 9 (FGF9), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), microvessel density and myocardial infarction area of rats in each group were compared. The expressions of CDK4 and FGF9, the contents of SOD and GSH-Px in groups C, D and E injected with Rg1 were significantly promoted compared to group B without Rg1 injection (P < 0.05). The survival rate of myocardial cells was significantly increased while the apoptosis rate was significantly decreased in group C, D, E compared to group B (P < 0.05). On the 3rd, 7th and 10th day following Rg1 treatment, the infarct area of E group was significantly decreased in three groups C, D, E, and the microvessel density of infarct area was significantly increased compared with group B (P < 0.05). So, Rg1 can improve the survival rate of myocardial cells, reduce the apoptosis rate and the area of myocardial infarction, and increase the microvessel density of infarct area, thus playing a protective role in ischemic myocardial cells of AMI rats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.