Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36125609›Full record

ReviewLa Radiologia medica2022

Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging as diagnostic tools for sarcopenia in immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs).

Fausto Salaffi, Marina Carotti, Andrea Di Matteo, Luca Ceccarelli, Sonia Farah, Catalina Villota-Eraso, Marco Di Carlo, Andrea Giovagnoni

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in La Radiologia medica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fausto SalaffiRheumatology Clinic, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Jesi (Ancona), Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3794-6831
Marina CarottiDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Radiology Clinic, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6562-180X
Andrea Di MatteoRheumatology Clinic, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Jesi (Ancona), Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0867-7051
Luca CeccarelliDepartment of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Sant'Anna, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0510-0970
Sonia FarahRheumatology Clinic, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Jesi (Ancona), Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9815-2621
Catalina Villota-ErasoDepartment of Rheumatology, Universidad de La Sabana, Chia, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7865-4643
Marco Di CarloRheumatology Clinic, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Jesi (Ancona), Italy. dica.marco@yahoo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0906-4647
Andrea GiovagnoniDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Radiology Clinic, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5264-652X
Marche Polytechnic University · ITOspedali Riuniti di Ancona · ITArcispedale Sant'Anna · ITUniversidad de La Sabana · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sarcopenia is characterized by loss of muscle mass, altered muscle composition, fat and fibrous tissue infiltration, and abnormal innervation, especially in older individuals with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs). Several techniques for measuring muscle mass, strength, and performance have emerged in recent decades. The portable dynamometer and gait speed represent the most frequently used tools for the evaluation of muscle strength and physical efficiency, respectively. Aside from dual-energy, X-ray, absorptiometry, and bioelectrical impedance analysis, ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques appear to have a potential role in evaluating muscle mass and composition. US and MRI have been shown to accurately identify sarcopenic biomarkers such as inflammation (edema), fatty infiltration (myosteatosis), alterations in muscle fibers, and muscular atrophy in patients with IMRDs. US is a low-cost, easy-to-use, and safe imaging method for assessing muscle mass, quality, architecture, and biomechanical function. This review summarizes the evidence for using US and MRI to assess sarcopenia.

Indexed as

Rheumatic DiseasesSarcopeniaAbsorptiometry, PhotonAgedBiomarkersHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMuscle, SkeletalBiomarkersImmune-mediated rheumatic diseasesMagnetic resonance imagingSarcopeniaUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID36125609
PMCPMC9587967
OpenAlexW4297855226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.