ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2022
[Initial preclinical assessment on-site].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of repeated exposure to an identical multi-user virtual reality anaphylaxis scenario on paramedic trainee performance: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- [Predictability of patient disposition from emergency medical services triage categories: exploratory analysis of routine data].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Article
- Mass Casualty Incident Training in Immersive Virtual Reality: Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of Multimethod Performance Indicators.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergency personnel assess their patients as an essential part of their daily work in emergency settings. The clinical assessment can help differentiate between immediately life-threatening conditions and milder diseases in patients. This assessment is the basis for an adequate preclinical treatment and for a rational referral to the hospital providing further care. Carried out in a thoughtful manner it allows reasonable allocation of resources for inpatient care.Well-founded training, clinical experience, scores, and tools in the form of acronyms for assessing the patient lead to successful assessments according to quality standards.The preclinical initial assessment is crucial for ensuring appropriate care for patients on site with life-threatening conditions as well as those with minor problems. Prioritization of a treatment depends on the severity of the condition or injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.