Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36125506›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2022

Radical nephroureterectomy for UTUC conferred survival benefits irrespective of age and comorbidities.

Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Chi-Fai Ng, Masatoshi Eto, Mallikarjuna Chiruvella, Umberto Capitanio, Tarik Esen, Guohua Zeng, Eric Lechevallier, Sero Andonian, Jean de la Rosette

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Comparison of preoperative nutritional scoring systems for predicting survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Jeremy Yuen-Chun TeohS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. jeremyteoh@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9361-2342
Chi-Fai NgS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Masatoshi EtoDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Mallikarjuna ChiruvellaDepartment of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Umberto CapitanioUnit of Urology, University Vita-Salute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Tarik EsenDepartment of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Guohua ZengDepartment of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Eric LechevallierDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Conception Academic Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France.
Sero AndonianDivision of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jean de la RosetteDepartment of Urology, Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKAix-Marseille Université · FRAsian Institute of Gastroenterology · INFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNIstanbul Medipol University · TRKoç University · TRKyushu University · JPMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe investigated the effects of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA) grading and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) on the survival outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

methodsThe CROES-UTUC registry was an international, multicenter study on patients with UTUC. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed by stratifying patients according to their age (≤ 70 and > 70 years old) and ASA grade (I-II and III-V)/CCI (0-1 and ≥ 2).

resultsA total of 2352 patients were included in this study. Patients aged ≤ 70 years with ASA grading of I-II (p = 0.002), and patients aged ≤ 70 years with a CCI of 0-1 (p = 0.002) had the best OS. Upon multivariate analysis, both in patients aged ≤ 70 and > 70 years, ASA grading and CCI were not significantly associated with OS. Patients aged ≤ 70 years with ASA grading of III-IV (p = 0.024) had the best DFS. When stratified according to age and CCI, no significant difference in DFS was noted. Upon multivariate analysis, radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) was significantly associated with better DFS in patients aged ≤ 70 and > 70 years; CCI of ≥ 3 was significantly associated with worse DFS in patients ≤ 70 years; ASA grading was not associated with DFS in patients aged ≤ 70 and > 70 years.

conclusionsA high ASA grading and CCI should not be considered contraindications for RNU. RNU should be considered even in elderly patients when it is deemed feasible and achievable after a geriatric assessment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsAgedComorbidityHumansNephrectomyNephroureterectomyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAgeASACharlson Comorbidity IndexNephroureterectomyUrothelial carcinomaUTUC

Identifiers

PMID36125506
OpenAlexW4297855384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.