ArticleXenotransplantation2022
Genetic modifications designed for xenotransplantation attenuate sialoadhesin-dependent binding of human erythrocytes to porcine macrophages.
Article in Xenotransplantation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sialic acid in the regulation of blood cell production, differentiation and turnover.Immunology · 2024Review
- A Monocytic Barrier to the Humanization of Immunodeficient Mice.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The phenomenon of diminishing hematocrit after in vivo liver and lung xenotransplantation and during ex vivo liver xenoperfusion has largely been attributed to action by resident liver porcine macrophages, which bind and destroy human erythrocytes. Porcine sialoadhesin (siglec-1) was implicated previously in this interaction. This study examines the effect of porcine genetic modifications, including knockout of the CMAH gene responsible for expression of Neu5Gc sialic acid, on the adhesion of human red blood cells (RBCs) to porcine macrophages. Wild-type (WT) porcine macrophages and macrophages from several strains of genetically engineered pigs, including CMAH gene knockout and several human transgenes (TKO+hTg), were incubated with human RBCs and "rosettes" (≥3 erythrocytes bound to one macrophage) were quantified by microscopy. Our results show that TKO+hTg genetic modifications significantly reduced rosette formation. The monoclonal antibody 1F1, which blocks porcine sialoadhesin, significantly reduced rosette formation by WT and TKO+hTg macrophages compared with an isotype control antibody. Further, desialation of human RBCs with neuraminidase before addition to WT or TKO+hTg macrophages resulted in near-complete abrogation of rosette formation, to a level not significantly different from porcine RBC rosette formation on porcine macrophages. These observations are consistent with rosette formation being mediated by binding of sialic acid on human RBCs to sialoadhesin on porcine macrophages. In conclusion, the data predict that TKO+hTg genetic modifications, coupled with targeting of porcine sialoadhesin by the 1F1 mAb, will attenuate erythrocyte sequestration and anemia during ex vivo xenoperfusion and following in vivo liver, lung, and potentially other organ xenotransplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.