ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022
Calibrating Hepatitis E Virus Serological Assays Using Asymptomatic Specimens Obtained in Japan.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing Hepatitis E Virus Seroprevalence among Slaughterhouse Workers in Western Saudi Arabia: Zoonotic Threats in Focus.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2025Article
- Assessment of the Diagnostic Performance of Fully Automated Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) Antibody Tests.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) in Makkah, Saudi Arabia: A Population-Based Seroprevalence Study.Viruses · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to calibrate hepatitis E virus (HEV) serological assays. We optimized the previously developed in-house HEV antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) by setting the cutoff with an in-house serological performance panel consisting of broad HEV antibody titers and subtracting nonspecific background values for anti-HEV IgM, IgA, and IgG. We also compared the assay's performance with that of commercial serological assay kits (four kits for IgM, one for IgA, and two for IgG). Although all serological assays readily detected HEV antibodies at high titers in the symptomatic hepatitis E population, considerable variations between assays were observed in the asymptomatic population. The in-house ELISA showed a higher sensitivity for HEV IgM, IgA, and IgG than the commercial kits and detected the seroconversion of HEV IgM and IgG earlier when testing a commercially available HEV seroconversion panel. The low sensitivity of the commercial kits was due to the high setting of the original cutoff, which was demonstrated by receiver operating characteristic analysis. However, the corrected cutoff value reduced assay specificity. Background subtraction is essential to achieve high specificity because the in-house ELISA without background subtraction reduced its specificity. These results indicate that asymptomatic specimens and background subtraction contribute to the optimization of HEV serological assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.