Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36125209›Full record

ReviewEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2023

Risk of ionizing radiation in pregnancy: just a myth or a real concern?

Majdi Saada, Erick Sanchez-Jimenez, Ariel Roguin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ALARA+: Summit on Radiation and Orthopedic Risks in Fluoroscopic Laboratories.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  6. Radiomitigators: Breakthroughs in Post-Radiation Recovery.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. [Compatibility of family and cardiac electrophysiology].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2025
    Article
  11. Occupational Health Hazards in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Results of the 2023 SCAI Survey.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Radiation Exposure and Protection for (Assumed) Pregnant Interventional Cardiologists and Electrophysiologists.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. What Is Needed to Encourage Women to Choose Careers in Interventional Cardiology.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Clinical considerations of emergent oral manifestations during pregnancy.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Majdi SaadaCardiology Department, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Technion - Israel Institue of Technology, Ha-Shalom St, Hadera 3810101, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-4520-160X
Erick Sanchez-JimenezCardiology Department, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Technion - Israel Institue of Technology, Ha-Shalom St, Hadera 3810101, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7961-1204
Ariel RoguinCardiology Department, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Technion - Israel Institue of Technology, Ha-Shalom St, Hadera 3810101, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are natural concerns regarding the risks posed to the foetus by ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy. Therefore, many female physicians select to avoid working in an environment associated with ionizing radiation exposure like the catheterization laboratory and even exclude training as electrophysiology, interventional cardiologists, or radiologists. For those already working in this field, pregnancy involves usually a 1-year interruption (pregnancy and maternity leave) to their careers, leading at times to delays in the decision to become pregnant. This review describes the low added risk of malformation/cancer in the offspring, highlight gaps in our understanding, discuss several common wrong beliefs, and recommend how to further decrease radiation dose, especially during pregnancy.

Indexed as

CardiologistsOccupational ExposureRadiation ExposureFemaleHumansPregnancyRadiation DosageRadiation, IonizingAngiographyCardiologyPregnancyRadiation hazardsWomen

Identifiers

PMID36125209
PMCPMC10103573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.