Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36125119›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Distance estimation from monocular cues in an ethological visuomotor task.

Philip R L Parker, Elliott T T Abe, Natalie T Beatie, Emmalyn S P Leonard, Dylan M Martins, Shelby L Sharp, David G Wyrick, Luca Mazzucato, Cristopher M Niell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Visual computation in the cephalopod brain.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2026
    Review
  2. PSD-95 drives binocular vision maturation critical for predation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Ecological Visual Processing in the Mouse.Annual review of neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A spinal substrate for modular control of natural behavior.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Richness of Vision in the Mammalian Brain: Neural Codes for Visual Perception and Behavior in Three Dimensions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Development of the Binocular Circuit.Annual review of neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Philip R L ParkerInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6224-9747
Elliott T T AbeInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
Natalie T BeatieInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
Emmalyn S P LeonardInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
Dylan M MartinsInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
Shelby L SharpInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
David G WyrickInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
Luca MazzucatoInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8525-7539
Cristopher M NiellInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6283-3540

Funding

Visual coding in freely moving behaviorR34NS111669 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI NIELL, CRISTOPHER M · 2019 to 2019
$626k
A naturalistic visual task for studying distance estimation in the mouseR21EY032708 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI NIELL, CRISTOPHER M · 2021 to 2022
$383k
Serotonergic Modulation of Neuronal Computations in Primary Visual CortexF32EY027696 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI PARKER, PHILIP ROSS LUTTON · 2017 to 2019
$177k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY027696NEI NIH HHS R21 EY032708NINDS NIH HHS R34 NS111669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In natural contexts, sensory processing and motor output are closely coupled, which is reflected in the fact that many brain areas contain both sensory and movement signals. However, standard reductionist paradigms decouple sensory decisions from their natural motor consequences, and head-fixation prevents the natural sensory consequences of self-motion. In particular, movement through the environment provides a number of depth cues beyond stereo vision that are poorly understood. To study the integration of visual processing and motor output in a naturalistic task, we investigated distance estimation in freely moving mice. We found that mice use vision to accurately jump across a variable gap, thus directly coupling a visual computation to its corresponding ethological motor output. Monocular eyelid suture did not affect gap jumping success, thus mice can use cues that do not depend on binocular disparity and stereo vision. Under monocular conditions, mice altered their head positioning and performed more vertical head movements, consistent with a shift from using stereopsis to other monocular cues, such as motion or position parallax. Finally, optogenetic suppression of primary visual cortex impaired task performance under both binocular and monocular conditions when optical fiber placement was localized to binocular or monocular zone V1, respectively. Together, these results show that mice can use monocular cues, relying on visual cortex, to accurately judge distance. Furthermore, this behavioral paradigm provides a foundation for studying how neural circuits convert sensory information into ethological motor output.

Indexed as

CuesVision, MonocularAnimalsDepth PerceptionHead MovementsMiceVision, Binoculardistance estimationethologymouseneurosciencevisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID36125119
PMCPMC9489205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.