Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36125097›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2023

Anti-osteoporosis medication dispensing by clinical commissioning groups in England - an ecological study of variability in practice and of the effect of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Sobia S Janjua, Helen F Boardman, Arvind Sami, Antony Johansen, Li Shean Toh, Kassim M Javaid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Treatment patterns of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis in Denmark: findings from the ROmosozumab in Scandinavia real-world Evidence Study (ROSES).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sobia S JanjuaDivision of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4560-0208
Helen F BoardmanDivision of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5341-5619
Arvind SamiNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2961-8579
Antony JohansenSchool of Medicine, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4726-9106
Li Shean TohDivision of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9228-6266
Kassim M JavaidNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7985-0048

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate whether the rate of Anti-Osteoporosis Medication (AOM) dispensing was related to prevalence of risk factors and hip fracture incidence in the local population.

methodsThe Open Prescribing database was used to analyse dispensed AOM at the level of Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) in England. Male Healthy Life Expectancy (MHLE), Female Healthy Life Expectancy (FHLE), the prevalence of smoking and active adults, the incidence of hip fracture and of alcohol related hospital admissions, and local dispensing of a comparator drug (atorvastatin) were considered as predictor variables. Linear and multilinear regression were performed. Using atorvastatin as a comparator, AOM dispensing was compared after the start of the Covid-19 pandemic with the same quarter the previous year.

resultsRates of AOM per 1000 people aged over 65 years in a CCG area varied between 379.2 and 1129.1, with a mean of 670.3. Population risk factors were individually related to the amount of AOM dispensed in an area. Collectively, local activity levels in adults (p = 0.042) and local hip fracture incidence (p = 0.003) were significantly negatively correlated with rates of AOM dispensed. Rates of alendronate dispensing fell significantly at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic (p < 0.001), whilst atorvastatin dispensing rates significantly increased (p < 0.001).

conclusionLower rates of AOM dispensing were seen in areas with a higher proportion of active adults and higher incidence of hip fracture. Multidisciplinary services should be developed to address this care gap with consideration given to local population risk factors. Community pharmacists are ideally placed to play a vital role in osteoporosis management.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsCOVID-19Hip FracturesOsteoporosisAgedAtorvastatinEnglandFemaleHumansMalePandemicsAtorvastatinBone Density Conservation Agentsbisphosphonatescommunity pharmacyCOVID-19denosumabosteoporosis medicationreal-world data

Identifiers

PMID36125097
PMCPMC10092162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.