Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36125089›Full record

SynthesisThe Australasian journal of dermatology2022

Dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease: An interdisciplinary decision framework for prescribers in the Australian setting.

Peter Foley, Yves A Kerdraon, John P Hogden, Stephen Shumack, Lynda Spelman, Deshan F Sebaratnam, Charles S Su, Constance H Katelaris

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Australasian journal of dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peter FoleyDepartment of Dermatology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5891-5607
Yves A KerdraonSave Sight Institute, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9567-6630
John P HogdenThe Eye Health Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Stephen ShumackSydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9121-7795
Lynda SpelmanSpecialist Connect Services, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7330-4713
Deshan F SebaratnamDepartment of Dermatology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5896-8178
Charles S SuOrbit, Plastic and Lacrimal Unit, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Constance H KatelarisClinical Immunology and Allergy Unit, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4412-1336

Funding

Sanofi
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesDupilumab-associated ocular surface disease (DAOSD) is of particular relevance in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Guidance on DAOSD assessment and management in the Australian setting is needed to reduce its impact and minimise disruption to treatment.

methodsA systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify data pertaining to the incidence, pathophysiology, risk factors and management of DAOSD. A critical review of this literature was used to inform a decision framework for dupilumab-prescribers and develop a graded severity scoring tool to guide appropriate management options.

resultsDAOSD typically emerges within 4 months of commencing dupilumab and the occurrence of new events diminishes over time. The reported incidence varies widely depending on the nature and source of the data: 8.6-22.1% (clinical trials programme), 0.5-70% (real-world data; differences in study size, duration of follow-up, ophthalmologist intervention, use of prophylaxis). Occurrence increases with AD severity and in patients with prior history of ocular disease; pathophysiology is still to be fully characterised. Management options have evolved over time and include lubricants/artificial tears, corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, antihistamines, anti-inflammatory agents and antimicrobial agents. Current therapies aim to resolve symptoms or reduce severity to levels sufficiently tolerable to enable continuation of dupilumab therapy.

conclusionsRecommendations for DAOSD assessment and management include identification of high-risk patients, vigilance for red flags (keratoconus, herpetic and bacterial keratitis), regular assessment of symptom severity (before and during dupilumab therapy), conservative management of mild DAOSD by the prescribing physician and ophthalmologist referral for collaborative care of moderate-severe DAOSD and high-risk patients.

Indexed as

Dermatitis, AtopicEye DiseasesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAustraliaHumansSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizeddupilumabatopic dermatitiscollaborative caredupilumabocular surface diseasesymptom managementsymptom severity

Identifiers

PMID36125089
PMCPMC9826507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.