Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36124869›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022

Theory of local k-mer selection with applications to long-read alignment.

Jim Shaw, Yun William Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Min-frame transformation enables more sensitive viral genome alignment.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Elucidating Transitions ofJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. High-resolution metagenome assembly for modern long reads with myloasm.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The open-closed mod-minimizer algorithm.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The Statistics of Parametrized Syncmers in a Simple Mutation Process Without Spurious Matches.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2024
    Article
  12. A near-tight lower bound on the density of forward sampling schemes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. k-nonical space: sketching with reverse complements.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Sketching Methods with Small Window Guarantee Using Minimum Decycling Sets.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Density and Conservation Optimization of the Generalized Masked-Minimizer Sketching Scheme.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Screening Host Genomic Data for Wolbachia Infections.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  19. Creating and Using Minimizer Sketches in Computational Genomics.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jim ShawDepartment of Mathematics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 2E4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6990-7829
Yun William YuDepartment of Mathematics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 2E4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8275-9576

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationSelecting a subset of k-mers in a string in a local manner is a common task in bioinformatics tools for speeding up computation. Arguably the most well-known and common method is the minimizer technique, which selects the 'lowest-ordered' k-mer in a sliding window. Recently, it has been shown that minimizers may be a sub-optimal method for selecting subsets of k-mers when mutations are present. There is, however, a lack of understanding behind the theory of why certain methods perform well.

resultsWe first theoretically investigate the conservation metric for k-mer selection methods. We derive an exact expression for calculating the conservation of a k-mer selection method. This turns out to be tractable enough for us to prove closed-form expressions for a variety of methods, including (open and closed) syncmers, (a, b, n)-words, and an upper bound for minimizers. As a demonstration of our results, we modified the minimap2 read aligner to use a more conserved k-mer selection method and demonstrate that there is up to an 8.2% relative increase in number of mapped reads. However, we found that the k-mers selected by more conserved methods are also more repetitive, leading to a runtime increase during alignment. We give new insight into how one might use new k-mer selection methods as a reparameterization to optimize for speed and alignment quality. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Simulations and supplementary methods are available at https://github.com/bluenote-1577/local-kmer-selection-results. os-minimap2 is a modified version of minimap2 and available at https://github.com/bluenote-1577/os-minimap2. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSoftwareMutationSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID36124869
PMCPMC9563685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.