Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36124813›Full record

SynthesisJournal of Crohn's & colitis2023

Comparison of the Risk of Crohn's Disease Postoperative Recurrence Between Modified Rutgeerts Score i2a and i2b Categories: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.

Pauline Rivière, Joel Pekow, Nassim Hammoudi, Pauline Wils, Peter De Cruz, Christina Pu Wang, Míriam Mañosa, Jacob Ollech, Matthieu Allez, Maria Nachury and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. How Reliable Is Endoscopic Scoring of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn Disease?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.

Pauline RivièreHôpital Haut-Lévêque, Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie et oncologie digestive - Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1262-2806
Joel PekowGastroenterology Department, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Nassim HammoudiService d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Pauline WilsUniv. Lille, Institute for Translational Research in Inflammation, Lille, France.
Peter De CruzGastroenterology Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Christina Pu WangDr Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Míriam MañosaHospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.
Jacob OllechGastroenterology Department, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Matthieu AllezService d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Maria NachuryUniv. Lille, Institute for Translational Research in Inflammation, Lille, France.
Michael A KammDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Maya AhanoriGastroenterology Department, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Marc FerranteDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1492-0716
Anthony BuissonService d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6347-409X
Siddarth SinghDivision of Gastroenterology and Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
David LaharieHôpital Haut-Lévêque, Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie et oncologie digestive - Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Momar DioufDirection de la recherche clinique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie Site Sud, Amiens, France.
Mathurin FumeryService d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie Site Sud, Amiens, France.
University of Chicago · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversité de Lille · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRAustin Health · AUCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRHospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol · ESIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USKU Leuven · BEThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Training Program in Cancer Prevention and Control for Priority PopulationsT32CA225617 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Guy H Montgomery, JUAN P WISNIVESKY · 2018 to 2026
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA225617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe modified Rutgeerts' score [RS] differentiates i2a-lesions confined to the anastomosis-and i2b-more than five aphthous ulcers in the neoterminal ileum with normal intervening mucosa, with or without anastomotic lesions-categories. Its relevance for the therapeutic management of Crohn's disease [CD] patients after ileocolic resection is still debated. Our objective was to compare the postoperative recurrence risk in patients with an i2a or i2b score, using an individual patient data meta-analysis.

methodsWe conducted a systematic literature search until July 2020, to identify all relevant studies reporting the i2a/i2b status in the year following ileocolic resection and clinical and/or surgical postoperative CD recurrence in their follow-up. Individual patient-level data were obtained from the corresponding authors. The association between the modified RS and time-to-event was evaluated using a mixed Cox model with the centre as the random effect.

resultsSeven studies published between 2008 and 2019 were included, corresponding to 400 patients: 189 [47%] i2a and 211 [53%] i2b. Median [interquartile range, IQR] time from ileocolic resection to ileocolonoscopy was 6.2 [5.5, 7.9] months and median [IQR] follow-up time after ileocolonoscopy was 4.5 [2.9, 7.3] years. The risk of clinical postoperative recurrence at 1 and 3 years was 11% [6-15%], and 25% [18-32%] in the i2a group versus 9% [5-13%] and 33% [26-41%] in the i2b group [p = 0.63 and p = 0.12, respectively]. No significant difference was observed in terms of time to clinical postoperative recurrence [p = 0.16] or surgical postoperative recurrence [p = 0.87]. Results did not change after excluding patients having initiated an immunosuppressant or a biologic in the 3 months after endoscopy [remaining cohort, n = 361].

conclusionsIn this individual patient data meta-analysis, no difference was observed between i2a and i2b subcategories with regards to clinical or surgical postoperative recurrence. As we wait for prospective trials, the same treatment strategy could be applied to all patients classified as i2 on the Rutgeerts score.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseColectomyColonColonoscopyEndoscopy, GastrointestinalHumansIleumProspective StudiesRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesCrohn’s diseaseendoscopypostoperative recurrence

Identifiers

PMID36124813
PMCPMC10216875
OpenAlexW4296765545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.