Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36124681›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2023

Reporting and management of incidental lung findings on computed tomography: beyond lung nodules.

Carolyn Horst, Shivani Patel, Arjun Nair

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Opportunistic Screening on Chest CT, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carolyn HorstCancer Imaging Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Shivani PatelGuy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Arjun NairUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-nodular incidental lung findings can broadly be categorised as airway- or airspace-related abnormalities and diffuse parenchymal abnormalities. Airway-related abnormalities include bronchial dilatation and thickening, foci of low attenuation, emphysema, and congenital variants. Diffuse parenchymal abnormalities relate to the spectrum of diffuse parenchymal lung diseases cover a spectrum from interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and pulmonary cysts to established diffuse parenchymal lung abnormalities such as the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias and cystic lung diseases. In this review, we discuss the main manifestations of these incidental findings, paying attention to their prevalence and importance, descriptors to use when reporting, the limits of what can be considered "normal", and conclude each section with some pragmatic reporting recommendations. We also highlight technical and patient factors which can lead to spurious abnormalities.

Indexed as

Lung Diseases, InterstitialPulmonary EmphysemaBronchiHumansLungTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID36124681
PMCPMC9975526
OpenAlexW4296786067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.