Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36124675›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2022

Multi-modality artificial intelligence in digital pathology.

Yixuan Qiao, Lianhe Zhao, Chunlong Luo, Yufan Luo, Yang Wu, Shengtong Li, Dechao Bu, Yi Zhao

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yixuan QiaoResearch Center for Ubiquitous Computing Systems, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Lianhe ZhaoResearch Center for Ubiquitous Computing Systems, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7736-2443
Chunlong LuoResearch Center for Ubiquitous Computing Systems, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Yufan LuoResearch Center for Ubiquitous Computing Systems, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Yang WuResearch Center for Ubiquitous Computing Systems, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Shengtong LiMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Dechao BuResearch Center for Ubiquitous Computing Systems, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Yi ZhaoResearch Center for Ubiquitous Computing Systems, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Innovation Fund of Institute of Computing and Technology E161080National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFC2500203Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences 922-001003130 185RCStrategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences XDA16021400Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China LY20C060001Zhejiang Provincial Research Center for Cancer Intelligent Diagnosis and Molecular Technology JBZX-202003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In common medical procedures, the time-consuming and expensive nature of obtaining test results plagues doctors and patients. Digital pathology research allows using computational technologies to manage data, presenting an opportunity to improve the efficiency of diagnosis and treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) has a great advantage in the data analytics phase. Extensive research has shown that AI algorithms can produce more up-to-date and standardized conclusions for whole slide images. In conjunction with the development of high-throughput sequencing technologies, algorithms can integrate and analyze data from multiple modalities to explore the correspondence between morphological features and gene expression. This review investigates using the most popular image data, hematoxylin-eosin stained tissue slide images, to find a strategic solution for the imbalance of healthcare resources. The article focuses on the role that the development of deep learning technology has in assisting doctors' work and discusses the opportunities and challenges of AI.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceEosine Yellowish-(YS)HumansEosine Yellowish-(YS)deep learningdigital pathologymulti-modalitywhole slide images

Identifiers

PMID36124675
PMCPMC9677480
OpenAlexW4296777402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.