ArticleNucleic acids research2022
Accurate in silico confirmation of rare copy number variant calls from exome sequencing data using transfer learning.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- CN-RNN: a Deep Learning Framework for Copy Number Variation Detection with Exome Sequencing Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Applications for Deep Learning in Epilepsy Genetic Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- SVcnn: an accurate deep learning-based method for detecting structural variation based on long-read data.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Copy Number Variation and Osteoporosis.Current osteoporosis reports · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exome sequencing is widely used in genetic studies of human diseases and clinical genetic diagnosis. Accurate detection of copy number variants (CNVs) is important to fully utilize exome sequencing data. However, exome data are noisy. None of the existing methods alone can achieve both high precision and recall rate. A common practice is to perform heuristic filtration followed by manual inspection of read depth of putative CNVs. This approach does not scale in large studies. To address this issue, we developed a transfer learning method, CNV-espresso, for in silico confirming rare CNVs from exome sequencing data. CNV-espresso encodes candidate CNVs from exome data as images and uses pretrained convolutional neural network models to classify copy number states. We trained CNV-espresso using an offspring-parents trio exome sequencing dataset, with inherited CNVs as positives and CNVs with Mendelian errors as negatives. We evaluated the performance using additional samples that have both exome and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data. Assuming the CNVs detected from WGS data as a proxy of ground truth, CNV-espresso significantly improves precision while keeping recall almost intact, especially for CNVs that span a small number of exons. CNV-espresso can effectively replace manual inspection of CNVs in large-scale exome sequencing studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.