Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36124619›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2022

The effects of physical and temporal certainty on human locomotion with discrete underfoot perturbations.

Nicholas Kreter, Carter Lybbert, Keith E Gordon, Peter C Fino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicholas KreterDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, 250 South 1850 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1567-6287
Carter LybbertDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, 250 South 1850 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Keith E GordonDepartment of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University, 645 N Michigan Ave, Suite. 1100, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Peter C FinoDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, 250 South 1850 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8621-3706

Funding

Interdisciplinary Engineering Career Development Center in Movement and Rehabilitation SciencesK12HD073945 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DEWALD, JULIUS P, REINKENSMEYER, DAVID JAY · 2012 to 2021
$7.9M
Eunice Kennedy Shiver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNICHD NIH HHS K12 HD073945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foot placement can be selected to anticipate upcoming perturbations, but it is unclear how this anticipatory strategy is influenced by available response time or precise knowledge of the perturbation's characteristics. This study investigates anticipatory and reactive locomotor strategies for repeated underfoot perturbations with varying levels of temporal certainty, physical certainty, and available response time. Thirteen healthy adults walked with random underfoot perturbations from a mechanized shoe. Temporal certainty was challenged by presenting the perturbations with or without warning. Available response time was challenged by adjusting the timing of the warning before the perturbation. Physical certainty was challenged by making perturbation direction (inversion or eversion) unpredictable for certain conditions. Linear-mixed effects models assessed the effect of each condition on the percentage change of margin of stability and step width. For perturbations with one stride or less of response time, we observed few changes to step width or margin of stability. As response time increased to two strides, participants adopted wider steps in anticipation of the perturbation (P=0.001). Physical certainty had little effect on gait for the step of the perturbation, but participants recovered normal gait sooner when the physical nature of the perturbation was predictable (P<0.001). Despite having information about the timing and direction of upcoming perturbations, individuals do not develop perturbation-specific feedforward strategies. Instead, they use feedback control to recover normal gait after a perturbation. However, physical certainty appears to make the feedback controller more efficient and allows individuals to recover normal gait sooner.

Indexed as

GaitPostural BalanceAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFootHumansLocomotionWalkingBalanceLocomotor controlMotion captureProprioception

Identifiers

PMID36124619
PMCPMC9659331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.