Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36124520›Full record

SynthesisNoise & health

Impact of Noise Exposure on Risk of Developing Stress-Related Health Effects Related to the Cardiovascular System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Kapeena Sivakumaran, Jennifer A Ritonja, Haya Waseem, Leena AlShenaibar, Elissa Morgan, Salman A Ahmadi, Allison Denning, David S Michaud, Rebecca L Morgan

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Noise & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Association between occupational noise and obesity: a retrospective cohort study in China.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Noise Disturbance and Well-Being in the North of Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kapeena SivakumaranDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON; Evidence Foundation, Cleveland Heights, OH, USA, Canada.
Jennifer A RitonjaUniversité de Montréal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC; Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Haya WaseemDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON; Evidence Foundation, Cleveland Heights, OH, USA, Canada.
Leena AlShenaibarDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON; Evidence Foundation, Cleveland Heights, OH, USA, Canada.
Elissa MorganDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON; Evidence Foundation, Cleveland Heights, OH, USA, Canada.
Salman A AhmadiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Allison DenningHealth Canada, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate, Consumer & Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
David S MichaudHealth Canada, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate, Consumer & Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Rebecca L MorganDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON; Evidence Foundation, Cleveland Heights, OH, USA, Canada.
Health Canada · CAQueen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: : Exposure to acute noise can cause an increase in biological stress reactions, which provides biological plausibility for a potential association between sustained noise exposure and stress-related health effects. However, the certainty in the evidence for an association between exposures to noise on short- and long-term biomarkers of stress has not been widely explored. The objective of this review was to evaluate the strength of evidence between noise exposure and changes in the biological parameters known to contribute to the development of stress-related adverse cardiovascular responses. Materials and Methods: This systematic review comprises English language comparative studies available in PubMed, Cochrane Central, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases from January 1, 1980 to December 29, 2021. Where possible, random-effects meta-analyses were used to examine the effect of noise exposure from various sources on stress-related cardiovascular biomarkers. The risk of bias of individual studies was assessed using the risk of bias of nonrandomized studies of exposures instrument. The certainty of the body of evidence for each outcome was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Results: : The search identified 133 primary studies reporting on blood pressure, hypertension, heart rate, cardiac arrhythmia, vascular resistance, and cardiac output. Meta-analyses of blood pressure, hypertension, and heart rate suggested there may be signals of increased risk in response to a higher noise threshold or incrementally higher levels of noise. Across all outcomes, the certainty of the evidence was very low due to concerns with the risk of bias, inconsistency across exposure sources, populations, and studies and imprecision in the estimates of effects. Conclusions: : This review identifies that exposure to higher levels of noise may increase the risk of some short- and long-term cardiovascular events; however, the certainty of the evidence was very low. This likely represents the inability to compare across the totality of the evidence for each outcome, underscoring the value of continued research in this area. Findings from this review may be used to inform policies of noise reduction or mitigation interventions.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular SystemHypertensionBlood PressureHeart RateHumansNoiseand EvaluationAssessmentCardiovascularDevelopmentenvironmental noiseGrading of Recommendationshemodynamicssoundstress

Identifiers

PMID36124520
PMCPMC9743313
OpenAlexW4296797132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.