Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36124494›Full record

Trial reportThe Indian journal of medical research

Revisiting the Chingleput BCG vaccination trial for the impact of BCG revaccination on the incidence of tuberculosis disease.

Banurekha Velayutham, Kannan Thiruvengadam, Paramasivam Paul Kumaran, Basilea Watson, Krishnan Rajendran, Chandrasekaran Padmapriyadarsini

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Indian journal of medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Tuberculosis prevention: current strategies and future directions.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Banurekha VelayuthamDepartment of Clinical Research, ICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kannan ThiruvengadamStatistics Section, Epidemiology Unit, ICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Paramasivam Paul KumaranDepartment of Clinical Research, ICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Basilea WatsonStatistics Section, Epidemiology Unit, ICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Krishnan RajendranStatistics Section, Epidemiology Unit, ICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Chandrasekaran PadmapriyadarsiniDepartment of Clinical Research, ICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
National Institute of Research in Tuberculosis · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & objectives: Vaccines play a crucial role in the prevention of tuberculosis (TB). Revaccination with Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) for the prevention of TB is an important strategy that is currently gaining interest. The objective of this study was to reanalyze the community-based Chingleput BCG vaccination trial for protective efficacy of BCG revaccination against incident TB disease. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the Chingleput BCG vaccination trial (conducted in 1968) data was carried out. Data on participants with evidence of prior BCG vaccination at trial intake and randomized to BCG vaccine [low dose (0.01 mg), high dose (0.1 mg)] and placebo arms were analyzed. The incidence of TB disease, which was based on sputum culture and/or chest X-ray was compared between the BCG and placebo arms over a 15 yr follow up period. Results: Of the 269,727 individuals randomized in the trial; 263,158 had no evidence of TB at baseline, of which 4436 (1.68%) had evidence of BCG vaccination at trial intake (2890 in the BCG vaccine and 1546 in the placebo arms, respectively). There were 77 (190 per 100,000) and 64 (296 per 100,000) incident TB cases in the BCG and placebo arm, respectively, at 15 yr post-vaccination. The incidence of TB disease was significantly lower in the BCG arm [Hazard ratio of BCG arm (95% confidence interval): 0.64 (0.46-0.89)]. Interpretation & conclusions: Retrospective data analysis of this community-based trial revealed that BCG revaccination in a community offered modest protection against the development of TB disease at the end of 15 years which, however, requires further evaluation.

Indexed as

BCG VaccineTuberculosisHumansImmunization, SecondaryIncidenceRetrospective StudiesVaccinationBCG VaccineBCG revaccinationChingleput trialprotective efficacyTB incidencetuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID36124494
PMCPMC10319383
OpenAlexW4296226104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.