ArticleJournal of minimal access surgery
Feasibility, safety and oncological outcomes of minimally invasive oesophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma - Experience from a tertiary care centre.
Article in Journal of minimal access surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) has improved the resectability and survival of operable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). We aimed to study if nCRT for OSCC makes minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) technically more challenging and if the peri-operative and oncological outcomes are acceptable for MIO following nCRT. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of patients with OSCC (cT1-2N1-2, cT3-4aN0-2) treated with nCRT and MIO between 2013 and 2019 was performed. The operative details including the technical difficulty in tumour dissection and lymphadenectomy, the post-operative complications and oncological outcomes were studied. Results: Seventy-five patients (male:female - 50:25; mean [range] age - 55.49 ± 8.43 [22-72] years; stage II - 34.7%; stage III - 37.3%; stage IVA - 28.0%) were enrolled. The concurrent chemotherapy course was completed by 25.3% of patients and the most common reason limiting the completion of chemotherapy was neutropaenia (66.0%). A thoraco-laparoscopic (n = 60) or hybrid (n = 15) McKeown's oesophagectomy with a two-field lymphadenectomy was performed. The increased surgical difficulty was reported in 41 (54.7%) patients, particularly for mid-thoracic tumours and tumours exhibiting incomplete response. The 30-day overall and major complication rate was 48.0% and 20.0%, respectively, and there was no mortality. The rate of R0 resection, pathological complete response and median lymph nodal yield were 93.3%, 48% and 8 (range: 1-25), respectively. The mean overall survival (OS) was 62.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.6-71.8) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 53.5 months (95% CI: 43.5-63.5). The 1-, 2- and 3-year OS and RFS were 89.5%, 78.8% and 64.4% and 71.1%, 61.3% and 56.6%, respectively. Conclusion: Minimally invasive McKeown's oesophagectomy is feasible and safe in patients with OSCC receiving nCRT. The radiation component of nCRT increases the degree of operative difficulty, especially in relation to the supracarinal dissection and lymphadenectomy. However, this drawback did not adversely affect the short-term surgical or the long-term oncological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.